• REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      But you’re living in capitalism. Unless government forces billionaires to fund social programs, they will just keep getting richer, just like it’s happening right now (if we ignore the crashing markets, but you get the idea)

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mfw my girlfriend finishes studying translation in 2022 just in time for AI to come in

    • pelya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Synchronous translators are still very much in demand, as well as technical and legal translators.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s good. Shame it doesn’t pay enough to actually warrant being allowed to stay in the country.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not a Lemmy thing, it’s a global phenomenon. Humans are using AI more than ever, and believe it or not, humans use Lemmy.

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        But its not a gradual change. AI posts used to be rare, in 2 days i found more AI posts outside of a community made for AI generated pictures than in the 2 years i have used lemmy

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s because this is the first time AI comics have been passable. The quality simply wasn’t there before.

          Yeah humans are still far better, but this could be considered “good enough”.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the point of this comic in particular is to show that AI is already taking over art but since it’s done badly, at what cost is it taking over these jobs?

    • Having worked for a software company that needed translation services, I can confirm that translation software is indeed very necessary.

      People would notice when the word “date” is interpreted as “date on a calendar” in one file and “romantic event” in another, but AI sure doesn’t.

      Even Google’s apps have broken Dutch translations by reusing existing strings for different contexts that don’t mean the same elsewhere. “Search” gets translated to different words depending on if it’s used a noun or a verb, for fucks sake!

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I have done professional translation, as a side gig. The usual workflow involves a first run through machine translation (Deepl is my favorite), then opening the machine translation in a translation program (I use CafeTran), which is used to make the second pass, by the human translator. This program doesn’t translate (they can use one of the main translation engines) but provides a bunch of tools to make the translation refining process easier.

      Pure machine translation is a hack. AI can’t grasp nuances, contexts, etc… You will often see many words that may have several meanings, used incorrectly, for example.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Did you miss the “usual” part? I know there are translations that need to be done strictly by humans, but they are definitely not the majority. In my country there is a group of translators that are “official” translators, people with an actual masters in translation, and who must pass a very hard official exam. They translate things like official documents, legal matters, etc, but they do a very small percentage of translations.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You think maybe your experience isn’t the only workflow that exists for translation and different audiences might require different levels of scrutiny and authenticity? No, you think the other person is completely full of shit instead and just decided to be an ass about it. Titles don’t mean shit by the way, I’ve handed so many Sr. Architect titles to admins even though they can’t see the forest from the trees or understand the business side of anything just to shut them up while I found someone to replace their ego. Flippantly throwing around a title lets everyone else that knows what’s actually going on that you can’t stand on your own merit, that’s all, get over yourself and stop being flippant towards people sharing their experiences just because they were different than your own, it’s childish.

          • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think frosty pieces is salty because their pieces are cold and dead. Sounds like they got a lateral “promotion” to a place where their toxic bullshit would be someone else’s problem.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s true that it can’t replace a skilled profession. But I honestly believe you could replace most middle management with AI already. Of course the bar is incredibly low on that.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I find most of the AI art generators are just allowing people who aren’t artistic to make their own stuff which they wouldn’t have paid someone for anyways if AI wasn’t there, they would have just gone without, so it’s not really a lose to artists.

      • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s a small, relatively low value market of commissioned online art that has been and will continue to be impacted. People who may have paid $50-60 for a (furry) OC will start going to AI image gens as the process becomes more refined and allows them to add detail to the end result without much effort.

    • maporita@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Correct. But it has made Translators more productive so we need fewer of them. But the productivity gains will create other jobs and so on. So it’s not as clear cut as people think. What will likely happen is that some jobs will vanish (anyone here remember elevator operators?) while some jobs will change and in other cases new professions will be created.

        • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Well if it’s forbidden and wrong it sure didn’t stop one company I worked for from throwing all the strings in their app into Google Translate before giving the humans a crack at it. Maybe try being less hostile and accept that your experience isn’t universal.

            • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Well you’ve definitely made one thing clear: that you’re an asshole. I will just disregard everything else you’ve said because I don’t respect the opinions of assholes especially ignorant ones.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I worked with a translator yesterday. She teaches courses, but she said she does translation because the money is good. I’ve worked with her for a while at this point, as well as dozens of other translators, on nearly a daily basis. They’re very much still in demand.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        We clearly operate in two different job markets, I got paid €9/page (pre taxes) for specialized automotive texts in the 2010s. Not to mention the other violations of the labor laws of my country.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          And this is perhaps me using the wrong term (translator v. interpreter), as I’m talking about speaking and not writing. I can never remember which is which, if there is a distinction.

    • LordAmplifier@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Maybe I’m not super up to date on AI stuff, but I worked as a translator for a year, and AI (they used ChatGPT and DeepL) still made a bunch of mistakes that you’ll immediately notice when you speak the language. It feels like their training input had a bunch of older, Google-translated articles in them that were just bad. Maybe an AI trained specifically for translation with curated learning material and a “teacher” who corrects mistakes can get closer to replacing human translators, but it’d still miss the cultural context of certain words and phrases that are in a translator’s passive vocabulary, at least in less wide-spread languages.

      That being said, it’s definitely harder to make a career out of translating because companies who don’t know any better just use AI instead. As long as they get their point across (and make money), they don’t care about the finer details.

      • takeheart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, a skilled human is still better at the job. But you don’t always need to capture every nuance. And AI does it at the fraction of the cost.

        I see this with lots of German product descriptions on big store fronts like Amazon. They often seem entirely machine translated. It’s not great, but “good enough” and serviceable.

        Machine translation can also increasingly shifts the process from the sender of the message to the recipient. It used to be that the web page of a Vietnamese company was inaccessible if you didn’t speak Vietnamese or they specifically had an English version. Nowadays a visitor can choose to get the entire site translated automatically (by the browser, for instance). Is it as good as the translation by an expert? Of course not. But it costs the company nothing at all and the visitor a negligible amount. And it works for a plethora of languages.

        That’s another (invisible) way that the world needs less and less translators. I wrote this post in English but for all I know someone could be reading it in French or Bengali. No further input required from my side.

      • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure if I’d agree here. I think that used properly, AI definitely has great use-cases, especially in areas of science, like medicine.

        As with any new “invention”, there is the tech-bros that jump at it first chance they get and try to push it into anything. We had that with blockchain, we had that with crypto, we had it with web3 and now we have it with AI.

        The tech isn’t bad at all, it’s actually extremely useful, but the use-cases it’s put to work at aren’t.

        • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          As someone who works in tech I’d agree with you. AI is a tool for humans to use that can help make tasks easier and lighten workload but it won’t replace them.

        • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The luddites were unironically entirely correct and capitalist disenfranchisement of capital has made the world objectively worse despite the wealth it brought to 0.001% of the population.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Eh. It’s more like popular history remembers the bullet points of their ideals and not the reality.

              What’s stupid is thinking LLMs are AI.

            • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Its cute you have your own call out forum for people that disagree with your neoliberal generic beliefs and all; one that only you post to or really participate in bar a few lost /all viewers, but that’s not an argument.

              People being upset that their livelihoods are being destroyed while their previous bosses become immeasurably richer while doing even less work were objectively on the right side of history given where it has lead us-- with the greatest wealth disparity in all of known human history, and the most people food and shelter insecure in all of human history.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh man is translation not possible with AI. You have no idea how little languages have in common. A lot of terms don’t mean a thing, but combine concepts you don’t have or associate to point at a thing.

    My dad said, about learning a new language, ‘‘cat means cat, not gato, don’t translate’’ and I think that holds up pretty well from my experience.

    • batu@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can’t be serious, buddy. I’m translating an entire episode with ai and it’s turning out better than the Netflix translation!

    • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean given that “AI” are language models built on context and relations between words I’d argue that that’s one of the more applicable jobs compared to what’s listed in OP. With none of them is it capable of doing well, but I just wouldn’t argue that translation is outside that realm of what’s listed above

      • Nangijala@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The problem is that the AI doesn’t understand cultural context. I dunno where you’re from so pardon me for assuming you’re likely an English speaker.

        A good translation isn’t just to translate what the text says but to communicate the same idea to the reader or viewer within their cultural context. A good example is Disney’s Aladdin where Robin Williams improvised A LOT during the recording sessions and most of his jokes are full of contemporary American cultural context. I’m Danish and most Danish kids didn’t understand these American jokes so our translators decided to switch out some jokes with other jokes that conveyed similar points but within a Danish cultural context.

        An AI cannot do that. It will translate what is written and it will be fucking nonsense to the receiver because they don’t understand the context or the references.

        AI is only good at translating as long as what is written can be translated 1:1. And even then I sometimes wonder. Because as a Dane I have noticed how terrible Word is at Danish when it comes to corrections. It follows English language context and will underline correct words in red and suggest alternative that aren’t real Danish. For example, Danish words are slammed together while in English they are separated = skolelærer - school teacher. Word could very well decide to red line skolelærer and suggest to you that you should separate the word and make it two = skole lærer. But in Danish that would nullify the meaning. Now it is no longer a school teacher but a school and a teacher.

        And I have seen on streaming services like Netflix and on steam how they lazily threw descriptions into a translator and it is just the most broken Danish I have ever read. It is so fucked because the newer generations of Danes who use these services are being influenced by them to learn incorrect Danish.

        I have very limited trust in AI to do a better job at it since it isn’t Danish people that have trained it and it doesn’t understand our culture, our history nor how we communicate with one another. Everything that comes out of digital text based platforms from the US is our language filtered and massacred through US context. It is very very bad in my opinion and incredibly lifeless and soulless.

        It would be the same the other way around btw. Me writing a piece of text with significant Danish cultural context and humor, slang and references would be translated into total nonsense for an English speaker, I’m sure.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh man is translation not possible with AI.

      i mean, it’s pretty good at it? A lot of human translators even struggle with the same problem, the AI is just a lot faster, and significantly more versatile. That’s arguably one of it’s strongest areas of performance, is translation, because it’s so well suited to it.

      • Gibibit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        AI currently completely does not understand the context of translation when it comes to visual media. Whereas a human translator can use that for additional interpretation

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You think it’s OK because it spits out grammatically correct language on your end, but if you spoke both languages you’d get how it fails. Look at translations of Korean comics if you’d like to see how badly mechanical translation is when it’s a connected story across multiple chapters, I was reading a comic where a character said he liked the elegant and sophisticated sound of calling a lightning strike skill ‘‘bolt’’ instead of whatever he was calling it ‘‘lighting strike’’ I think. It took me a while to realize what or whoever translated it didn’t know how to look at the context of the translation and find a English word that English speakers would find at least old fashioned if not archaic and of course longer or more poetic sounding. It’s like the whole thing when JRPGs can’t figure out if they should localize names by just spelling out the phonetic sounds in Roman letters or actually translating the meaning of the name, or a thing no one’s ever done and find a name in a European language family that has the same meaning.

        Just like the AI art, it’s not replacing good translation, it’s replacing hack job translations, it’s replacing mediocre and predictable art. I really don’t care if someone uses AI in the pre-production or some post production functions, just not the part you need a human for, the actual creativity, there’s an adage in 3D animation ‘‘it you let the computer do it, it’s gonna suck.’’ You can let the computer do inbetweens, but you better be giving it nothing near a key frame. It has to really be the very least important frames.

      • itslola@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s still doing a consistently poorer job than a skilled translator, because it has no concept of nuance or tone. I encounter people getting themselves worked up over information in AI-translated news articles, so I go back to the source material and discover it’s mistranslated, under-translated, or just completely omitted parts of sentences. It’s very Purple Monkey Dishwasher.

        The quality is better than it was a decade ago, sure, but that’s a pretty low bar. Back then it was gibberish, nowadays it’s natural-sounding phrases with incorrect translations.

        • Mikrochip@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          And yet, translators are losing their jobs left and right, from what I hear. Sure, quality has gone down, but most people don’t seem to care. Plus, in a lot of cases, instead of the AI doing all the work, translators proof-read AI generated texts and correct the worst mistakes. Fewer translators can translate more at a lower price this way.

          Does the quality still go down a bit that way? Probably. But again, who cares? Not the people spending money on translations, that’s for sure.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          this is true, but for the average person, who just wants to translate something to make it make somewhat sense, it’s great.

          Though yeah, you can’t really trust it, there’s a lot of intricacies.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Automation and job replacement is a good thing. The reason it feels bad is because we’ve tied the ability to satisfy our basic needs to employment. In an economic model that actually isn’t a dystopian hellscape, robots replacing jobs is something to celebrate.

    And to switch our economic model to one in which a person can thrive without pissing the vast majority of our lives away on the grind; we just need to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps!

    • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The reason it’s bad is because the political leaders don’t have a grasp about automation and has not made any effort to provide a safe net for people whose jobs got replaced. If UBI was a thing and automation was in full swing, I don’t think there would be a lot of negativity.

    • This is so important.

      An aspect of post scarcity is that people shouldn’t have to work. AGI might allow that; LLM is starting to fill some niches.

      The problem is how it’s being done. Rather than benefiting society as a whole, it’s enriching a few. In an ideal world, people whose jobs are replaced should get a stipend. We should all be eagerly awaiting that time when our jobs are replaced and we get a paycheck - maybe a little reduced - but now we’re free to pursue our interests. If that means doing your old job, only now it’s bespoke, artisan work, great.

      The other missing factors are free energy and limitless resources; but we’re making progress on energy, but resources are an issue with no solution on the horizon. Plus, we’re killing the planet by just existing, so there’s that.

      We have a lot of problems to solve but AI is part of the solution, except that it’s being done wrong. And expensively.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        but resources are an issue with no solution on the horizon.

        We’ve got tons of resources, and the means the produce more. The problem is that’s not going to make some people lots and lots of money, so they don’t do it.

        Scarcity is not a problem of “can’t” right now, it’s a problem of “won’t”.

        • We’re going to run out of oil in the next 30 years, and it’s not just cars that will affect. The mass produced factory farmed food that feeds 90% of the world’s population is utterly dependent on fossils fuels. There are almost no “Tesla” giant combines. And the trains that transport food to the cities run on fossil fuels. Cities will collapse. Air transport and ocean shipping will cease, destroying the global economy.

          Many of the remaining oil reserves are in deep water, which are each and every one a ma not e environmental catastrophe waiting to happen, and as the easy reserves dry up, offshore drilling will become more common.

          Meanwhile, we’re running out of precious metals needed to make cheap consumer electronics. And white we’re finding new reserves and the finite limit may not be a close, as computers and phone components become more expensive, and only the well-off will be able to afford them. The income disparity we see within our countries will become global, with entire countries falling behind.

          And then there’s fresh water. This will become a bigger problem as time goes on, and water wars will become large scale events.

          We’re living on a finite planet of finite resources. Our only hope for space exploration is a couple of commercial companies run by the 21st century equivalent of robber barons. If we do start mining asteroids for materials, those resources still be utterly monopolized by a single handful of individuals.

          I don’t understand your belief that we still have plenty of resources, when the scientific community has been warning that we’re running through our reserves ever faster, for years.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Again, those things are a matter of “won’t” rather than “can’t”. It costs “too much” to find alternatives, so companies don’t. Funding for alternate resources simply don’t exist at the level that’s necessary because it doesn’t make anyone lots and lots of money.

            Those scientists are warning that we should start looking for alternatives, not that we should give up because it’s simply not possible to find an alternative.

            I understand that you don’t want to look further than that, but I judge you for it. Maybe stop taking things at face value and look a little deeper.

            • There is a distinct difference between believing that we can’t, or should give up - which is what you’re accusing me of doing - and recognizing the reality that we aren’t and by all evidence, won’t. Certainly not before it’s too late.

              • Zorque@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                and recognizing the reality that we aren’t and by all evidence, won’t.

                That’s… literally what I’ve been saying. Have you been ignoring that? My entire point was about motivation, not ability. Your entire point seems to be that there’s no other options and nothing we can do about it. About how it’s the end of the world and we can’t do anything about it.

                Sure, people aren’t right now, but a big part of that is because people aren’t accepting why. You can go on and on and on about how we’re not, but unless you put the least amount of thought into why and how to do something meaningful about it, it’s just doom-posting to trick people into thinking we should all just give up.

                So. If you want to prove to me, or others, or even to yourself, that that’s not true… maybe start thinking about what we can do, or just shut up. Because we don’t need more people talking about how it’s all pointless and there’s nothing else we can do. We get plenty of that every day from people much smarter than random people on the internet.

            • No. 20 years ago it was “50 years,” so we’re pretty on track.

              More reserves are accessible to us now with modern technology, but it’s being harder, more expensive, and more dangerous to get at. We’re stretching it some, but… do you imagine there’s infinite crude oil in the planet?

          • Val@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Right you got me thinking so here’s my thoughts. Not looking to argue just discuss the points you’ve made.

            1st paragraph:

            Global economy crashing is a good thing. Like you have pointed out it is completely dependent on a non-renewable resource on top of that it is one of the biggest contributors to worldwide exploitation. It also a contributes to cultural colonialism.
            more info: youtube.com/watch?v=4UJSf_oyVAo.

            When it comes to farming. People will come up with solutions. I believe that farmers are competent enough that when we run out of oil they aren’t just going to go. “welp guess I starve now”. They are going to innovate and do what they can to keep going. Also swapping out an ICE motor for an electric one doesn’t seem that complicated.

            Also Interesting that you didn’t mention plastics. The most used oil product in the world. I’ll be so glad when they’re finally gone.

            2nd paragraph is just a continuation of the first.

            3rd paragraph

            The key word in this paragraph is make. We don’t really need to make any more electronics. We’ve already made enough. How many processors do you think are just sitting in some warehouse never to be used because a newer model came out. How much of those precious metals are inside cars that are going to be useless once oil runs out. We need to focus on recycling and reusing existing things and devices instead of making new ones.

            4th paragraph

            Water is a cycle. It doesn’t just disappear. We already recycle most of our water. Although I’m not that knowledgable on the topic so I can’t say much about it.

            5th paragraph

            skip.

            6th paragraph

            The scientific community has made those assertions with the assumption that we are going to keep doing what we’re doing. Mindless consumerism, buying and making new things, and abusing our planet. And they are right. What I and the commenter you’re replying to are (probably) saying is that the problems with resources are caused my how we live our lives and the problem disappears without capitalism, consumerism and the constant resource abuse they create. A more sustainable shift in society and economics will solve these problems

            Also

            I sidestepped you’re points about money, because I am an anarchist. I see capitalism and money as the precise reason for this artificial scarcity and natural abuse. Like you even said in you’re comment even if we get infinite resources in the form of asteroid mining it still won’t be distributed properly due to monopolies. Having more resources won’t fix anything because the problem is the market that distributes them being inefficient due to running entirely on profit motive. The solution is to end capitalism and when we do we are going to find that we have more than enough without needing to do asteroid mining. Where would we even get the fuel? doesn’t that require oil?

            • Okay, but @Zorque stated that “we have plenty of resources,” and that’s what I was disagreeing with. If your belief is that we need a global famine, more wars, and the collapse of civilization - and that, somehow, if we recreate civilization without access to the easy resources because we already used all those up the first time, we’ll do it better next time… we’ll agree to disagree.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Global economy crashing is a good thing.

              Takes like this are why I think it should be illegal for anyone under the age of 25 to express any opinions about anything whatsoever

              • Val@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I can get everything I need to comfortably live from a 20km radius, or I could If my country hadn’t outsourced clothes production to china. why does my life need to rely on a regime that’s half the planet away while destroying the said planet in the process?

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        We have a lot of problems to solve but AI is part of the solution, except that it’s being done wrong. And expensively.

        There’s also a conversation to be had about which jobs shouldn’t be automated, either because current technology isn’t suitable, or because it might never be suitable. And I’d say that pretty much everything that we are calling ‘AI’ right now falls under that - I’ll say that robots are part of the solution, but I don’t think ‘AI’ is.

        • I agree. LLMs are not AGI. But there are some jobs they can do, and a lot of jobs they can assist.

          But I think we’re still another generation of apparent AI stagnation, maybe another 20-30 years, before someone figures out there next link; and that might be AGI.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    When I see these kinds of posts I just look over at the vibe coders and just laugh harder than any joke about ai taking our jobs

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was extremely skeptical so I looked into it and it absolutely does not work. There was also a guy on YouTube who basically tried to make a Minecraft clone with Vibe coding and it just fell apart almost instantly.

        All I was trying to do was get it to set up a basic scene in UE5 with some lighting effects and import a model of the building from the assets library. Nope, did not work. I didn’t even bother trying to implement game logic as it was so clearly a waste of time. The amount of time I spent trying to get it to do basic stuff, stuff that you would be able to do in UE5 after half an hour of training, I could have made significant progress on a gray box by then.

  • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As an automechanic, my job will never replace by AI, but instead we’re fucked by low wages and the black box automobile has slowly become.

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The rich will always have money to pay better people to make beautiful things for them

    Just be useful to the rich and you’ll survive

    Just like they planned it

      • Suite404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I just watched a movie (Geostorm) where these obviously super wealthy people were in a skyscraper and the movies like “oh no, they might die if no one stops this!”

        Good? I’m more concerned about all the people below them getting swept away. These rich fucks should finally feel fear for fucking once.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Amusingly, cook is probably the safest of those positions for the time being. The physicality and necessity of presence makes it harder to automate. Lawyer, doctor, and teacher can be done remotely, and is based largely on knowledge, so they are prime targets. People are already trying it. Drivers you could see being done remotely if we had faster, more ubiquitous, net connections, so it’s doable as well. It’s basically already happening. But cooking… AI doesn’t seem like it would give you the right kind of inputs and outputs to do that any easier/faster/cheaper. It’s already possible to make a food vending machine. The limitations of vending machines aren’t really that they need an easier interface on their database. AI won’t really help there. And to go beyond that and try to make an AI powered restaurant probably wouldn’t be profitable. It’s barely profitable to run a regular restaurant most of the time. If you try to put in the probable millions to automate a restaurant, it’d probably go the same way as the self-checkout lanes at stores, which is to say poorly.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Actually have all of the jobs I would think the safest are doctors and lawyers. When your life and liberty are on the line you really don’t want an emotionless machine you want a human.

      Years ago I had to have surgery on my neck to remove a benign tumor, and I absolutely wasn’t worried, I was definitely worried it would hurt but I wasn’t worried it would go wrong and I’d end up getting a major artery cut, because I trusted the person doing it, because they came and talked to me. I wouldn’t absolutely not trust a robot to do surgery, even if logically the robot would probably be better than the human.