• Google is set to cut hundreds of new jobs in its device and platforms divisions soon.
  • The company has continued to cut its Google Pixel teams, doing so earlier this year as well.
  • Rival Microsoft is considering a new round of layoffs next month, per reports.
  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why would they need more staff if they plan on developing it in a closed source manner now?

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Android has always been developed in a closed-source manner by Google engineers, the recent changes only reduces the visibility of ongoing changes and the ability for developers outside of OEMs to contribute to Android (such contributions were already rare).

      This is explained further in this article:

      While some OS components, such as Android’s Bluetooth stack, are developed publicly in the AOSP branch, most components, including the core Android OS framework, are developed privately within Google’s internal branch. Google confirmed to Android Authority that it will soon shift all Android OS development to its internal branch, a change intended to streamline its development process.

      • Mike@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        the recent changes only reduces the visibility of ongoing changes and the ability for developers outside of OEMs to contribute to Android (such contributions were already rare).

        Why is this so underplayed as if it’s nearly meaningless though, is my question? A huge part of open source code is transparency, and this decision is a big blow to exactly that.

        Only posting the code when it’s finished increases the risk that it will not be correctly scrutinized in the way its been until now, not to mention the precedent this sets. Death of the OS in AOSP by a thousand shallow cuts is what I see here.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well, if you don’t need programmers to work in place place at the corporate headquarters, you can hire them anywhere.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Not like they have made anything with innovative with pixel anyways, other their obsession with using AI

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I really do not want anything innovative in my phone TBH. Android works ok and the heavy lifting is done with apps. I really don’t want Google to move more crappy features into the OS and I really do not need stuff like those LIDAR sensors modern iPhones have. Just give me a smartphone with several years of security updates, enough speed to run my programs without issues, give me a good camera and I’m fine.

    • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Their cameras and image processing tech were innovative at the beginning right? They were beating out most other phone manufacturers until they caught up. Also their folding phones seemed pretty innovative in regards to their form factor. Idk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        pixel has better camera than some other androids, but thats about it. theres very little difference between androids relatively speaking.