• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So much is not being done with VR technology, mostly because Meta aren’t a technology company. They’re an acquisitions and holding company posing as a tech company.

    Give devs the ability to convert QR codes into VR objects.

    In this case this VR experiencer would look at two QR codes on a sign at the start of the walk, and the VR map could then be correctly overlayed onto the real forest.

    Or another use case: putting QR codes on exercise weights so the game can track them, rather than struggling to track your hands or controllers.

    • DontMakeMoreBabies@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The stupid looking thing hanging off your face is still going to be a huge turn off.

      Until they fix the form factor, VR isn’t going to be a real thing.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed, and that’s one of the main reasons why the Apple headset failed (other than the price, and the fact that it’s a VR headset that can’t play VR games, of course).

        Threw things need to happen before outdoor VR/headset AR becomes mainstream:

        1. It needs to look like a normal pair of glasses,
        2. It needs a to have mainstream software support,
        3. It needs to be affordable (less than $500, ideally under $300).
        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          1 can never happen, at least if you’re defining “normal” as currently fashionable sunglasses. AR maybe, but VR needs full color displays at a certain distance so the eye can focus and it needs to block out other light sources. And then the power source and computer needs to connect somehow. Maybe, as in sci-fi maybe, we can develop a superdense high-definition display that beams directly into the retina while compensating for the lens, variable focus, and general motion of the eye so it can sit an inch away and look crisp, but I can’t imagine that being realistic this side of fifty years (and it doesn’t solve the energy or processing problems). VR is either not going to be mainstream in our lifetime or everyone is going to accept wearing a shoebox on their face for the experience.

          2 and 3 are reasonable requests, there should be headsets that are as attainable and compatible as a standard monitor.

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That part about overlaying the map would be more AR, and idk if Facebook is doing work in that realm. I know Microsoft has been for years. I remember that cool little Minecraft demo from E3

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Their only AR feature for quest is passthrough. They’ve got their raybans but I doubt many are buying them. I couldn’t even tell you what they’re for.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are mostly correct. The quest can detect walls and furniture, so there are some fun looking irl platformer game demos, but nothing big yet. Developers have only just been granted access to the camera feeds.

          The raybans have sold 2m units. I think the target market is instagramers not XR enthusiasts.

          • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Meta rolled back furniture detection … and “passthrough” means the camera feeds… You can’t access individual cameras just the whole processed image at the end. It’s not like I can request just one video feed or something.