• Lysergid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Nope, JS is “You think you are nerd”.

    Also, why React is there? It’s a lib not a language

    • vala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      HTML 5 is also not a programming language.

      That being said. The JS hate is kinda cringe at this point. It’s a perfectly fine language all things considered.

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wouldn’t say it’s a perfectly fine language but I also don’t understand the people hating on JS developers. If anything kudos to them for suffering through a language filled with such BS as “==” not actually doing what you think it should do (when coming from other languages).

    • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Come on y’all, would you lay off the gatekeeping. Some of us still think the free web’s a good thing, lest we all end up in a walled garden hellscape. JavaScript is therefore needed if we’re being pragmatic. Just transpile it from TypeScript if you’re too stuck up for dynamic languages building something big.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Bottom right should be “You’re a need and getting old”.

    Source: I was dicking around with mod_perl yesterday.

      • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s mainly a tool for working with matrices (matrix laboratory). This is useful for solving ordinary differential equations. Learning Matlab is usually a requirement for first year engineering students. I’m now a licensed chemical engineer, and I haven’t used Matlab since sophomore year.

  • expr@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    A real nerd would know that React is a library and HTML is a markup language, and neither are programming languages.

  • 7empest@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use R for all sorts of bioinformatics shenanigens, and I remind myself daily I am not a nerd. Even my rows of warhammer books, minis and Corvus Corax poster confirm to me I am not a nerd… The Emperor Protects…my code

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      R still gives me chills, never hated a language until I had to use R in my PhD.

      Still furious when half packages need different versions of the same thing making them incompatible.

      • 7empest@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am a scientist and I used to use SAS for stats, and then started doing loads of bioinformatics in R. Institute decided they werent going to license SAS anymore, and didnt tell us. We get an email the day of, to say no more SAS. Then we have to drop evrything and concert all our SAS models into R… Cue bitching from instiute leaders as to why we had to halt all publications. Idiots.

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Most of these are scripting languages. Some are even markup languages. It’s like the meme creator didn’t even know what a programming language was.
    I hope someone got fired for that blunder

      • mriswith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Do you know what community you’re in? Do you want to start a war?


        There is no clear definition because there is a lot of overlap, especially when you get into the details, but:

        • Scripting languages are often considered to be very high level and can commonly run without compilation. Making them great to automate tasks or create a simplified interaction/abstraction layer to a more complex program.

        • Programming languages usually have much lower level access, and by extension they tend to be more complicated. In exchange for that, you get much more control. Although the access varies from Assembly to languages a C programmer would consider “scripting”.

        Although for every example, there is basically a counter example. Because programmers being who they are, basically see it as a challenge to do something with a language that others consider impossible or wrong.

        For example, there are things like NodeOS, a “Lightweight operating system using Node.js as userspace.”

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Scripting languages are often considered to be very high level and can commonly run without compilation. Making them great to automate tasks or create a simplified interaction/abstraction layer to a more complex program.

          Then Python is not a scripting language.

          Programming languages usually have much lower level access, and by extension they tend to be more complicated. In exchange for that, you get much more control.

          Would you consider C to be more or less complicated than Perl?

          • mriswith@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The first comment worked as bait, but that last question is way too obvious.


            Although just for fun:

            Then Python is not a scripting language.

            That is true. It is often used as one, but it was developed from the start as a general-purpose language.

            Would you consider C to be more or less complicated than Perl?

            You know about Python, Perl and C. You know the answer and you’re just trying to incense people.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, I’m trying to get people to think. If I laid out my full opinions on this subject (compilers and interpreters aren’t that different anymore, even machine code often runs more like bytecode in many ways, “scripting” is a term that hides what’s actually going on, etc.), then people get into endless debates. My questions are designed to pick apart assumptions.

              Admittedly, people didn’t appreciate when Socrates did this shit, either.

        • Pardal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          For example, there are things like NodeOS, a “Lightweight operating system using Node.js as userspace.”

          No way this exists.

          Wtf, it exists. Why would anyone do that to the world?

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        One is:

        • a scripting/interpreted language needs an interpreter to be installed on the target system in order to run
        • a programming/compiled language needs a compiler on the host machine and will run as-is standalone in the target machine

        /me ducks for cover

        • Valen@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Still a language to make the computer do something. Thus, programming language. Scripts are programs.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Some people think that only compiled languages are true programming languages. (Needless to say, they’re wrong.)

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, once you know all the details, the distinction disappears. The term doesn’t clarify understanding.

          If I had to make a distinction, it’d be that scripting languages are meant to be a simple way to serve a specific niche. Things like SQL or Excel formulas. It doesn’t apply to Python.

        • Malgas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Needless to say, they’re wrong.

          Not least because there’s no such thing as a “compiled” or “interpreted” language.

          Which is to say that it’s a property of the tooling rather than the language itself. There’s nothing stopping anyone from writing a C interpreter or a Python compiler.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s nothing stopping anyone from writing a C interpreter

            Except god, hopefully

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Not least because there’s no such thing as a “compiled” or “interpreted” language.

            I’d say there is (but the line is a bit blurry). IMHO the main distinction is the presence (and prevalence) of eval semantics in the language; if it is present, then any “compiler” would have to embed itself into the generated code, thus de-facto turning it into a bundled interpreter.

            That said, the argument that interpreted languages are somehow not programming languages is stupid.

    • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve had more than one job where Matlab was used extensively, guess my coworkers and I aren’t real engineers.

      I’d rather use something else, but if it’s what the group already uses, fine, I’ll do it

      Also, I don’t do a ton of true programming on it. It’s a fancy calculator, and occasionally I make a GUI app with it

        • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, I agree with you, I’d never pay for a Matlab license for myself if I ever decide to go the private engineering consultant route. Just sharing my experience that yes, it’s used in the professional world.

          • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s just so weird to me. I’ve worked at a few big companies and Matlab was just kind of out of the question at any of them. It was Excel or Python

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If we’re talking real engineering (like professional accredited engineering and not programmers calling themselves engineers) you couldn’t be more wrong. It isn’t used in deployment necessarily but for modeling and analysis it has no equal.

    • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So many come out of school with Matlab experience. I get them started with python. They brush me off. Then the license server goes down. Welcome to open source grasshopper! I should make a meme about this and put on my door…

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why hate? It allows for easy functional programming with vectorized operations that bind to C for efficiency.