• Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Gemini now has a second set of toggles buried in its settings menu. You can go to Profile → Apps inside the Gemini app and manually disable access to Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, or Utilities. But these are turned on by default, even if you’ve disabled tracking in the past.

    So I just went to the app in my neighbor’s phone, and it asked me to switch. I said no, and it won’t let me do anything else. So will this need to be done next week?

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I went outside my comfort zone and installed Lineage on my old Pixel, only to find out I couldn’t get wi-fi calling, so I reverted to my Google OS. Oh no. Any options other than Lineage or a new phone? This 6 year old phone works great except for the lack of updates, and expect for the upcoming Gemini updates :( I’m struggling.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I believe most people who care about privacy don’t trust Gemini or Google in general. So it’s not an issue if you already not using Gemini app. It can be uninstalled (at least for now) even without going alternative ROM way

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No, it’s really not. Primarily, because I’m using LineageOS with absolutely no Google services at all installed.

  • obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This makes me so happy I’m using Graphine OS. Also the entire idea that there “not storing my history” I don’t trust them. They have already been sued multiple times over keeping ingogneto data.

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    We use Chromebooks at my work (along with the whole Google suite), and we are bound by the rules of HIPAA. Without a way to opt out of this AI crap, I increasingly worry about what all of this means for our clients’ privacy. Especially with this administration, with RFK deadset on targeting people with disabilities.

    • BubblyRomeo@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We use Chromebooks at my work (along with the whole Google suite), and we are bound by the rules of HIPAA.

      Assuming you mentioning HIPAA and disabilities, you must probably work in the healthcare industry. What kind of backwater hospital/healthcare company uses chromebook?! I know chromebooks are prelevant in the education industry but healthcare… They are cheap but Google makes up that money through Google Workplace vendor lock in! Man… I have seen Linux running on hospitals even in 3rd world countries… If you can, please quit that job! A healthcare workplace using chromebooks will not give a damn to employees privacy!

    • Azteh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I have the Gemini settings but the app does not appear here. Should I consider myself “safe” or is it cause it’s still called Assistant on my phone?

      • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        i believe assistant only became gemini this year (or with the latest android update)

        previously you could install and uninstall gemini as you wish.

  • etherphon@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Great, well bye bye Pixel 6a, about time anyways I guess. I knew it was only a matter of time before they did something to make these devices completely unbearable, “AI” bullshit has done it.

      • ChocolateFrostedSugarBombs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I really really want to but I can’t for another year because I’m still paying off my pixel. It’s still carrier locked and I can’t unlock it till it’s paid off.

        • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yep you can’t flash carrier locked Pixels, I hope you don’t have much longer to wait or that the time will fly fast

          • ChocolateFrostedSugarBombs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s rough…I still have another 13 months I think. But to the article, I don’t have the options in my phone that they’re talking about. Do you? Or has it just not rolled out to me yet?

          • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 hours ago

            These projects suffer from the same issues with how Google share new Android versions. This is not a solution. Also if you have a Pixel I would personnaly use a secure locked bootloader OS rather than an unsecure unlocked bootloader. I tend to privilege /e/OS on Fairphone and LineageOS on phone that have already dropped support.

        • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          That is a misleading claim right here, don’t blindly trust everything you read online. The core team of the project explained it very well why it’s not as dramatic as people made it seems too. It’s not an ideal position and Google is definitely going in a direction that doesn’t not benefit AOSP but no Android16 is comming to GrapheneOS and future version also should.

              • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Did they explicitly say anywhere that future versions should be coming as well? I only see them mentioning Android 16, and devices still being “supported”, but that could also mean improvements in Android 16.

                • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  GrapheneOS will continue supporting the current devices we support until their end-of-life dates. We’ll also add support for new Pixels as long as they meet our requirements. We’ve tried to make that clear, but recent posts about changes to AOSP have been widely misrepresented. Prior to Android 16, Pixels had first class support in the Android Open Source Project as the official reference devices. This was never one of our requirements and no other device provides it.

                  From my understanding yes but maybe not in this thread

      • etherphon@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I will definitely give it a shot, I’ve loaded an alternate OS on a phone before but it was more about customization then. Hopefully there will continue to be options like this for people who prefer to use their own brain and don’t mind pressing buttons instead of giving voice commands. I don’t want to talk to inanimate objects I talk to myself enough.

        • zod000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          GrapheneOS will feel very different, and quite a bit less of the “fun” customization options, since its goal is security.

          • etherphon@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I’m not a huge phone user to begin with so thats fine as long as I can change some colors here and there, I prefer less fancy tbh for instance I like the i386-dark theme here.

            • zod000@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I am the same, so it wasn’t an issue for me either. I just wanted to confirm that you were not going to get the previous “fun” ROM experience.

        • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Well GrapheneOS is a a robust mobile OS built for security. It brings amazing privacy out-of-the-box and control features. You really own your phone! Not Google, not Big Techs and Government, YOU.

            • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Only non-carrier-locked Google Pixel phones. They have been talking about potential partnership with other OEM but it’s not easy with Google ToS for Android OEM manufacturer to support other OS officially. Also they have paranoid-level security model and beside a few company like Google, Apple and maybe Samsung few devices would meet their requierments… And you know, Samsung introduced Knox to prevent their users to flash other firmware or mod their hardware and the other one, Apple, is the company that killed the FOSS Cydia Store…

          • etherphon@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I will definitely give it a whirl, I also need to eventually switch my desktop to Linux as I’m still in W10, I used a lot of audio plugins (VST) that had no Linux versions but now I’m mostly hardware based. I just worry that there comes a time when it’s nigh on impossible to install an alternate OS on a phone but I suppose there will always be people trying to find a way.

            • pirat@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 hours ago

              RE: Audio stuff I switched to bitwig long before I switched to Linux. Having familiarity with a DAW that ran natively was awesome; I also had a lot of plugins that ran as windows only VSTs. Yabridge + Wine was the answer.

              You do have to downgrade wine to an older version (but this also helps you learn some Linux stuff) and works fairly well. I can even run omnisphere through yabridge (I do have a wild desktop tho so maybe not. the best point of comparison).

              Mint is the first distro I used and most everything was really easy for getting audio stuff up and running quickly. I’m now using Garuda which I mostly like; there are issues that I’m still trying to work out.

              • etherphon@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Thanks, interestingly Garuda was at the top of my list but maybe I’ll just stick to Mint and not be fancy. Bitwig always interested me and if I decided to go back to a DAW I’m definitely taking a second look because I have a tracker background from way back and the modularity and easy hardware integration look great. I’m not too concerned about the plugins so much as the hardware now, there is no official support for the Black Lion audio interface I bought but I’m assured it should work fine under ALSA and as I’m currently only needing it to record a stereo pair it should be fine. The plugins I use now are mainly compressors and EQs for some final mixing and “mastering” and there seems to be a decent amount of choices now for native plugins in those areas but I do have some favs I might need to bring over so I will check Yabridge. Look forward to getting my hands dirty again, hacking windows has just becoming getting rid of nuisances instead of customizing my computing experience.

                • pirat@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I mean I like Garuda, but I would say it has taken a bit more to set up. I think if you’re running AMD you’ll be fine, it just depends on how much tinkering you want to do. Honestly the biggest reason I switched was that I had moved to Debian and games were not working too well for me - gaming has been much smoother but my desktop environment is a bit glitchy and buggy (likely due to my nvidia / Intel stuff)

                  Bitwig has better support on debian-ish distros, which mint kinda is (at least it is able to download and run .deb files).

                  Bitwig has been my favorite DAW since I began using it more in 2019, and as my only DAW fully but EoY '19; I enjoy all the flexibility I have with modules and the like.

                  I am unfamiliar with the Black Lion audio interface from what I’m reading it looks like they have class compliant interfaces so it should work with pipewire.

                  Ubuntu studio with the audio suite may be a good way to go too.

                  Depends on the total use case tho. I’m a newbie too in Linux but am happy to answer what I can

                • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  If you’d be interested in a tracker-like DAW, Renoise has a native Linux version.

                  For more traditional DAWS, Bitwig and Reaper are the two best Linux native options. Reaper is quite cheap, and also offers a trial version that just nags you like winrar.

                • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  hacking windows has just becoming getting rid of nuisances instead of customizing my computing experience

                  I can totally relate to this! Perfectly sentenced.

            • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Honestly I think that AlternativeOS will always be possible, the main issue is how compatible it will be with everyday apps that people rely on. We’ve started to see some compatibility issue with Play Integrity on GrapheneOS, with Revolut (has been fixed) and Alternate AppStore such as AuroraStore having some apps refusing to launch if not installed from PlayStore itself.

              On the Linux side of thing you could see how your plugins performs on a VM and or see how Ardour plays with your hardware.

                • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  Yes. Revolut prevented new users to login in a specific version of their app (the newer). Users that were already logged in could update the app without issue and users could use an older APK of Revolut to sign in. However the PlayIntegrity process that was banning their GrapheneOS users have been resolved and now the harden OS is whitelisted from Revolut.

                  At least that’s what I have followed/understood from the whole thing but I am not a Revolut user.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If you don’t want this stuff on your phone, lemme point you to:

    GrapheneOS (Pixels only, has Most Security at Tinfoil Hat level while also providing compatibility for Google Play (optional, sandboxed) and SafetyNet)

    CalyxOS (Pixels, Some Moto G 5G, Fairphone 5, 4, SHIFTphone 8, less Security than GrapheneOS but has Security)

    LineageOS (Many older devices, runs unlocked boot so least Security but still can run sans google)

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t know anything about tech. I don’t want to contribute anything to AI, but I’m afraid I’m going to brick my pixel if I install any of this. Here’s a question. If I let them steal my info, does that hurt other people, or just me?

    • BingBong@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      If we are on an old pixel (eg pixel 4) is it more or less secure to switch to graphene? Neither Google nor graphene are doing updates for that model anymore

      I’ve thought of getting an 8 to put graphene on but the recent news from the project about Google making it harder on them has me pausing since I don’t fully understand what is affected.

      I don’t want Gemeni anywhere near my messages and phone content.

      • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 hours ago

        You can put graphene on a 4. It won’t be supported but will be more secure. Still not recommended by me or grapheneos. They say that the reason they support pixels is due to the security, not the aosp support, and that they will continue to develop grapheneos. Android 16 is the first new build with the changes and grapheneos is testing it now iirc. I would personally recommend seeing how 16 goes (possibly post after the update hits stable asking for user feedback) and decide based on that. You should probably get something new as the complete lack of security updates is quite bad but that could help you decide whether to go with graphene. Personally, I am on grapheneos and am not worried about it.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      They got that idea “ask for forgiveness not permission” pushed to them by capitalist extremists for too long. I despise that concept in any context, whether justifying rape or violating privacy or anything else. But I even see it in TV shows these days portrayed as normal. Gross 🤮