• Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    But what if the entirety of people making themselves obstacles to a kinder world actually start to push the world away from kindness? What if they force the world towards hate until that hate breaks the world, wars are started and thousands die? Are those obstacles still to be respected?

    In other words, how does the statement in the OP stack up to the paradoxon of tolerance? “If you are tolerant towards the intolerant, you will find the intolerant break your tolerant world.”

    • Gabe Bell@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      See this is where I said “context is king”

      Because I assumed the quote meant that you don’t have to respect the free will of all beings, especially those who make themselves an obstacle to a kinder world.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I could be wrong but my understanding of it means “don’t make excuses that someone doesn’t know when they’re being repeatedly callous and evil.”

      In other words, acknowledge they’re making conscious choices with their own free will and behave accordingly (say, Nuremberg style if we’re being polite).

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tolerance is a contract, not a paradox. Break the contract of tolerance, and find yourself no longer covered by it.