In short:

A mechanical heart has been implanted in a New South Wales man who was experiencing severe heart failure.

He has become the first person in the world to be discharged from hospital with the titanium heart.

What’s next?

Doctors say the invention will likely be an alternative for donor heart transplants in the future.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope no software is involved.

    software update is available, heart will be restarting now

    • FancyPantsFIRE@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Serious answer to a facetious reply: I’d imagine there has to be some level of software involved if it’s pulsing, even if it’s rudimentary or low level. I also wonder what it does in terms of the bodies demands such as during physically intense activities. I’d guess that it doesn’t which, along with the 4 hour battery life, probably answers why it’s a stop gap and not an alternative at this point. Still awesome though.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I watched a talk regarding a pacemaker/defibrillator incorrectly shocking a woman because she was an edge case (being younger than and pregnant). She sought help from doctors who, as you may guess, knew nothing about the software. The manufactures ghosted her when asking for information, let alone source code. Some of them are wireless, which makes it vulnerable to attack. Being in control of any software running inside our bodies is an important issue to consider.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wonder if the pump runs at a constant rate instead of pulsing… Imagine playing tricks on people because you’ve got no heartbeat!

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Old artificial hearts used to do that. It works but pulsing is better for your long term health IIRC.

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why only 4 hours though? How is the capacity of that battery? Also, how does thies heart react to increased demand like a normal heart does?

    • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I actually know this! I used to work on an LVAD controller about 10 years ago. The technology is largely similar.

      The pumps are centrifugal, they have to maintain blood pressure, and are largely waterproof.

      The pumps spin with a brushless DC motor controlled by PWM. Depending on the specifics of the motor the RPM can be between 8,000 and 22,000. Because of the limitations of battery technology, you’re stuck with using a LiPo battery. LiPos are annoying as all shit to deal with. You have to charge them carefully, discharge them carefully, and they’re pretty big.

      To give you an idea - FPV drone batteries can last several minutes: https://www.getfpv.com/batteries/mini-quad-batteries/auline-21700-4000mah-14-8v-a45-4s-li-ion-battery-xt60.html (if you need help with scale - the yellow connector is called an xt60). On a really carefully tuned racer, you can get maybe 5 minutes out of a quad that would use that battery.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    From the article…

    It is powered by an external rechargeable battery that connects to the heart via a wire in the patient’s chest.

    The battery lasts four hours and then alerts the patient that a new battery is needed.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              what’s the particular license about?

              These links can explain it better than I could …


              By default, everything you write, from a novel to an Internet forum shitpost, is not only copyrighted by you but also “all rights reserved.”

              What that guy is doing is (a) making his writings more available for reuse than they would be otherwise, and (b) making a point about how fucked-up it is that corporations treat stuff posted to social media as if it were a free-for-all they could use however they want.


              the license is actually a Creative Commons license for Non-Commercial uses. Creative Commons is a copyleft license that’s “free to use with some restrictions”. Mostly used in art, literature, audio, and film, for my part I’m using it to license my comments. Anybody can cite with attribution, but commercial use is forbidden by the license.

              The why: I just don’t like non-opensource commercial ventures. Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Facebook, Apple, and so on are harmful in many ways.

              Enforcement and legality: Microsoft’s Github CoPilot (a large language model / “AI”) was trained on copyrighted text source code. A few licenses clearly state that derivatives should also be opensource, which CoPilot is not. So there is a big lawsuit against it. Many artists, non-programmer authors, musicians, and others are also unhappy that AI was trained on their copyrighted works and have sued for damages. Until these cases make it out of court, it will not be clear if adding a license to comments could even jeopardize commercial AI vendors.

              Anti Commercial-AI license


              This link shows that ProPublica also licenses their content here on Lemmy.


              I want to license my content to be available to non-profit open-source, and restricted for for-profit.

              I understand that its not my responsibility to enforce laws, and that just because laws are not enforced currently that I should still be able to avail myself to them, as well as that enforcement of the laws may not be happen currently, but that enforcement will catch up to the reality on the ground.

              Also, that laws trump ToS’s. And “Safe Harbor” laws that corporate social media companies/sites protects themselves with state that we own our content, and not them. And that they (or anyone else) can’t use a ToS to strip away our ownership, and hence, our content licensing. Also, content licenses travel with their licensed content, no matter where the content is copied to.

              Finally, if the license link looks weird, it may be that your app/client does not support Lemmy.World’s formatting text. You would have to speak with the devs of the product you use to view Lemmy to get that corrected.

              A mods response to the usage of a license to a third-party.


              This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Arbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exposed wires? Does this mean I could overclock my heart with a bench power supply?