This will 1000% lead to some horrible bullshit when fsd inevitably plows into something it failed to see and a subsequent lawsuit against the victim…
If simple vandalism is punished so harshly, may as well go all in and torch the fucking things. There’s really no reason to stop at keying or painting anymore. Cosmetic damage is being punished as though they’re being rendered completely useless.
And edgelord baby billionaire should be happy since people will have to buy new cars, and surely his cars are gonna be their first choice, right?
If vandalism carries a harsher penalty than storming the Capital, well…
I’m sure many would like to drive a tesla into the Capitol, except they wouldn’t want to suffer the indignation of being seen driving one.
Might as well storm the capitol AND blow up some Teslas.
What crimes, other than storming the Capital during an official government proceeding and injuring over 150 police officers, are done out of love?
- Hiding migrants
- Feeding the poor
- Kicking the police off someone they’re choking out
- shooting CEO’s
I don’t think any judge will never charge that, it’s totally unconstitutional.
Tesla is a protected class?
That is what is happening. Tesla> Children
Someone please think of the Teslas!
Fascists are super thin-skinned whiny babies.
The upper class. The rest of us are just plebs.
Teslas are not upper class. They’re cheap, shitty cars. The handful of people driving Cybertrucks are paying 100k, but that’s not because they’re upper class, they’re just financially irresponsible.
Maybe you should slow down on the hate speech, pal. You’re getting awful crimey with that talk.
Excellent job, dumbfuck MAGA shitheads.
Kudos to the non-voting lefties for the assist!
Snowflakes are now a protected class.
Sounds woke
So what you’re saying is, destroy all the evidence, yes?
Between this and using wartime powers to deport people during peacetime, they’re just abusing all the laws.
Aye, fascism doesn’t believe in law or justice. Just power.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
