- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Summary
President Volodymyr Zelensky warned on March 28 that Ukraine will reject a proposed U.S. minerals deal if it endangers the country’s EU accession.
A new draft, reportedly granting the U.S. extensive control over Ukrainian natural resources, raised concerns over economic sovereignty.
Zelensky said lawyers will review the agreement, emphasizing it must not conflict with Ukraine’s constitutional EU alignment.
The initial deal would create a joint fund reinvesting extraction proceeds into Ukraine. The White House views it as a way to recoup aid, but Kyiv remains cautious after a prior dispute with Trump.
You must log in or register to comment.
deleted by creator
But the minerals will make the rich richer, so of course, the minerals MUST be mined! It’s capitalism 101
We require more minerals for the expansion of the creep!
Around here they build shopping malls over the most fertile land we have access to instead of using it to grow food for the millions of people living right next to it…
Ontario. Open for businesses.
Doesn’t really matter. Ukraine does not have significant rare earth deposits in the first place. The whole thing is a farce.
Iirc the dirty secret of rare earth metals is that every country has them in at least some capacity even if there’s variability in how easy to access those deposits are. The dirty part is that the countries that produce them less so have a particular abundance and more so have a lack of environmental regulations.
I was with you until you mixed nuclear into the post. Chernobyl was a series of human errors and bad decisions. We need nuclear to fix our energy issues and slapping the name onto a separate issue is dishonest and makes me doubt your intentions.
They never claimed that nuclear is bad, they claimed that the Chernobyl disaster has already negatively impacted the land enough, mining would only make it worse
Who is “we”?
e.g. Germany already produces 60% of its power reneweable. The plan is 100% by 2030-2035. And the prices for reneweables are already far below the ones for nuclear.
So why throw 10 billion euro into building a nuclear power plant that delivers 1 Gigawatt when you build reneweables for 1 billion that delivers 10 Gigawatt?
Nope, we don’t. This talking point is about a decade out of date. The solutions are all sitting right there without building any new nuclear.
https://www.amazon.com/No-Miracles-Needed-Technology-Climate/dp/1009249541
Claiming “we need nuclear” makes me doubt your competence. And I say that as someone who prefers fission plants over burning fossil fuels.
Don’t sign a deal with the US at all.
The US cannot be trusted.
Absolutely not. Assume they’re colluding with Russia.
A deal with the USA means nothing, but that is as true today as it was in 2014 and 2022.
We’ve reached the point where signing a deal with the US threatens EU membership 😞
Capitalists crave that mineral
Why the fuck would you even consider signing anything to that fat orange shit? Every single one of his administration just made a mockery of you last month
Why the fuck would you even consider signing anything to that fat orange shit?
Ask Chuck Schumer. He insists he’s got his reasons.
Because, unlike Trump, he wants his constituents to stop dying.
He shouldn’t sign it at all because it’s fucking stupid.
