I love the blind comment by the guy. He says people are sick of drama about what’s happening inside the DNC. Obviously almost nobody in the country gives one flying fuck about that. We all care what the DNC does, not have they have little power disputes.
To be more precise, we care that the DNC doesn’t give a damn for the average American, and they’ve shown no signs of improving for the last 20+ years.
Trust your instincts. If it’s really easy to write LLM prompts and generate consistently useful quality output, then there’s no chance you’ll make a lot of money doing so. You won’t even make a little money doing so, because that work will be outsourced to another country with a lower minimum wage.
Of course that’s the point. The AI snake oil sales people want bosses to believe that they can underpay or fire employees, but we know that it doesn’t work that way, that all of these companies are just screwing about to make a little bit of money for either the shareholders or the bosses or both.
It is interesting how people think that they know exactly what they’re going to write before they even start. Of course, most professional writers will tell you otherwise. You have to put the words on paper to see how they fit and to see if you’re happy with them.
That’s what they’re banking on, but we know that eventually they will f*** it up and lose everyone.
Probably the pipes get ugly if the plumber is trying to install 11s and 22s. Probably they will have a different idea.
The article is also full of bullshit and it gets basic history wrong. The agreement was never made, but to the extent it exists anyway, it was never supposed to be about a monopoly that’s destroying shit. Once upon a time, not even very long ago, there were competing search engines.
I know tech writers want to write stories that sound fancy, but if they don’t know the facts and the history then they need to find someone to proofread their work more carefully.
And maybe that’s okay, isn’t it?
Protests turn into riots when the police wanted to, exactly then, and very rarely before that point.
We can blame the officials. Don’t let the heckler’s veto work. It’s murder of course, but it’s also bullying. And capitulation only makes it worse next time. They’ll always have lunatics with guns.
Why? That question always has multiple answers. Are you asking for a historical timeline? That might be the true story, but it also might not feel compelling.
Above all else, remember that Reddit feels many sources of pressure. They want money and users, but they also need to limit spam, and they don’t wanna piss off the rich stock holders, either.
qpdf is handy for merging PDFs. Command line but quick to learn for most usage.
I don’t think we can accept your argument, because in point in fact Hong Kong was an independent country. Certainly trying to disagree but now we’re getting into a definition question, but if that’s going to stop us from applying the proposed principle, then we can do that in every situation.
Just what is a right, anyway?
Well no, it’s not, because they have multiple monopolies. So we should blame them and blame government for not stopping them.
You’re straw manning. Please don’t.
Recognizing that violence has in fact “been the answer” to various circumstances in the past, and will be in the future, is different from saying everyone should pick up a gun today.
Violence is never the answer … if you ignore all of human history, yes. Sadly, it often has been, though.
Historically you are wrong, though. Mixed pressure has value and can be effective… But surely you know that, right?
Obviously the situations are different. We all know that. The point is that it’s hypocritical of a company to say hey, let’s ask our employees to do more by throwing AI at them, and then getting pissed off when potential employees do the same thing.
Although I think it’s more funny than anything else. The company found out that people are gaming the system, which means they have a really shitty system, and rather than change how they interview people or what types of questions they ask, they’re just acting obstinate.
I think we’ve seen enough changes in social media platforms over the past few decades to say that your claim is true until it’s not. As payments to content creators fall, and as garbage postings increase, the actual value to the average user of the site is clearly decreasing. So we’ll see how long YouTube is relevant.
When you say most countries, which countries are you talking about?
And if you’re wondering where the US goes for help, I’m not sure what you mean, but there have been a variety of peacekeeping missions and wars over the past few decades where other countries worked alongside the United States. Whether you think those military operations were justified is a different question, but if you’re looking for which countries worked together, you can easily find out by browsing Wikipedia for 20 minutes.