• inductor@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every long oner has hidden cuts. These range from really simple, like something moving across the foreground to hide a wipe, to really difficult (expensive) like fully CG doubles to merge shots (probably too expensive for this TV show).
    I would suspect that at least 80% of the time, when something (or more often someone) moves accross the whole frame in front of everything else, its obscuring a wipe to the next shot.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      He could be lying, but the cinematographer for it says each episode was a single shot

      “There’s no stitching of takes together," cinematographer Matthew Lewis told Variety. “It was one entire shot, whether I wanted it to be or not.”

      I dont see why he’d say that if it wasnt as he’d look pretty stupid if some else came out and contradicted him.

      • gap_betweenus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Seems rather poetic then factual statement - what does " whether I wanted it to be or not." in this context even mean?

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think it’s refering to that they were only using a single camera and that the episodes were performed all the way though (up to 16 times per that article) on location without stopping. With those constraints there isnt really a way to make cuts.