• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m shocked that yet another anti-woke pos who gets triggered by pronouns turned out to be a predator. would’ve never guessed!

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    When you act erratic like that, you got caught. If you were innocent of even intention no long winded explanation of “they want me to disappear” would be necessary as the messages wouldnt even exist. The dildo of consequences has arrived for Guy Beahm.

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The great thing with your logic is no matter what he does he is guilty for you anyways. Great logic.

        • Aurix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          It is the pedohile predator messages that get me, when we talk about text flirting with a 17 year old. That is just not the scale of an issue people blow it out to be. People are like a rape-murder case almost happened. It is beyond ridicolous.

          • Holyginz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            It actually is a big deal. You really need to take some time to think it through to understand that. Either that or you are a troll and I’m just wasting my time right now 🤷‍♂️

            • Aurix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              I can’t believe somebody would type this for serious. First the jump between talking over text to rape is quite a long line in between. It is like us two disagreeing and me murdering you. And rape means non-consensual sexual intercourse. And given the age of 17 years, even if they would have consented, it wouldn’t be rape, as the person has enough emotional and sexual maturity to understand what it means. Now, it might be not legal in some jurisdictions, but this is just beyond wild proving my point people just want to make shit up.

              • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                It’s called statutory rape. And he was married and 38 at the time. And he was also trying to meet this person at twitch con. And this is the same year of twitch con that he was caught cheating on his wife.

                No amount of spin makes this OK. Please stop trying to justify pedophilia in defense of your favorite streamer. Sexting a minor is not ok, and the fact that even Beahm himself couldn’t spin this in a way that’s good for him should tell you something.

                • Aurix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  It wouldn’t qualify for that as depending on the country people can consent at that age. And we speak of a difference of a single year anyways. There is a reason people bring up marriage and age difference up instead, because it simply isn’t pedophilia. Current societal definition: “Psychiatric diagnostic criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.”

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    How quickly we went from “I didn’t do it” to “I did it, but it wasn’t that bad”.

  • Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    From the article, it sounds like he knew they were a minor and still leaned into the conversations. Why? Why TF would you even be curious about it?

  • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Seems like I have to add this moron to he ignore list right next to Musk, so I no longer see posts about him.

  • MikeOToxin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m no fucking predator or pedophile

    Well… If the person was a minor, and you weren’t, and you knew they were young and the messages were ‘leaning inappropriate’, you’re a pedophile.

    Also a predator.

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      That is not the words you should use for a 17 year old he didn’t even know was underage.

        • Aurix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Still not a pedophile nor a predator even for flirting. This is not a 12 year old, but in many jurisdictions a responsible adult.

            • Aurix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yeah, he is mainly a cheater on his wife. Not exactly great, but conversations on this sound like by people who never leave their basement and talk to people.

              • Aurix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                A pedophile predator is somebody who systematically texts underage people, and fishes out the vulnerable ones to exploit their weaknesses for their own satisfaction and exerts control over them. Speaking to a single, depending on the jurisdiction (±1 year), consenting adult (17 is young, but not completely stupid), with slightly flirty messages is absolutely not that. it isn’t even toxic. in fact, it devalues this tag for behaviour which is not cool due to the cheating and a bit skittish because of the age difference, but is otherwise kind of okay. See, next time somebody tells me about a pedophile predator I will be thinking about a conversation between two adults, or almost adult and not nasty abuse scarring people for life.

                • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Yeah that’s a fair take.

                  It is reprehensible and disgusting behavior, but it doesn’t mean we should universally apply labels across vast swaths of different issues, as it devalues said label and poisons future discussion.

                  Simple labels simplify discussion of course, but that runs the risk of losing nuance for the specific way someone was a disgusting creep.

                • Akrenion@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Have you talked to 17 year olds? They are far from developed in most cases. Anyone even in their late 20s should notice the difference in development and stay clear.

                • Aurix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  No point in leaving the windowless van, if I chained my highscool girlfriend inside it.

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Not in the jurisdiction he was in, and that’s all that matters.

            Also, while sending sexually explicit texts to minors (using only words) is not illegal, I’m pretty sure we can correlate what his intent was. What, do you think he’s going to come out and fully admit he’s a pedophile? No.

            Also, nowhere in any of his statements has he clarified that he didn’t know they were underage. If it were the case that he didn’t know, that’s a pretty fucking big deal and he should know how important it is to explain that. He didn’t though.

            Stop defending pedophiles.

    • weastie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I hate to get so semantical but using the word pedophile incorrectly just desensitizes the word. Pedophilia means being attracted to children, primarily meaning before or in the early stages of puberty, usually younger than 13. In fact, many pedophiles would not be attracted to someone aged 15+ because they are typically exclusively or primarily interested in prepubescent bodies.

      That doesn’t mean this guy isn’t a total asshole, but he’s not a pedophile, and I think anyone can understand an adult sexting an older teen, while still absolutely horrid, is quite different from sexting a child.

      Once again, absolutely not defending this guy, I don’t even know who he is… but I think it’s important not to desensitize the word.

      • MikeOToxin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I know the distinction, but hebephile doesn’t carry the same weight. Also, I believe I read the minor was 12. So… Pedo.

        I stand by what I said. We don’t need to be apologistic towards the scum of the earth. Kids are kids.

        • Asherah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Oh fuck. I heard she was 17 and that was fucking bad enough as is. Fucking hell this man is awful.

      • skittlebrau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve attended a seminar for child protection before that was delivered by a former cop (that worked in the sex crimes division) and they said the exact same thing - in the context of correctly making the distinction between paedophile and sex offender.

        Sounds like he was grooming her.

      • Christian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah I would totally agree with this if the word wasn’t already desensitized a very long time ago. The language has changed. (I’m assuming people were ever differentiating, I don’t really know/remember the history.) Colloquially it means interested in teens unless it’s clarified to be worse than that.

        I recommend not trying to make this argument, anywhere. It will not change the way people use words, even if it could there would not be a point (attraction to pre-teens is so egregious that it will always be clarified), and a lot of people will assume that someone who doesn’t accept the colloquial usage is themselves interested in teens and in denial about how the public actually views that to the point where they think only interest in prepubescent children is problematic and handwave everything else away as a language issue.

        • MikeOToxin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Colloquially, it’s a catch-all nowadays. Like I said in another reply, we don’t need to differentiate between lowest common denominators. That gets into sounding sympathetic to these fucks, and anyone who sympathizes might as well be one themselves.

  • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Is anyone else bothered (but not surprised) by the fact that Amazon/Twitch agreed to cover it up for him? Seems pretty wild that they should be off the hook for working to protect his image after doing predatory shit like this.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          They paid him to go away and to shut up. Twitch letting one of their most popular creators message sexual content to a minor over their platform for years is a PR nightmare. Shows the lack of oversight social media has. Why would they even allow a 12 year old the ability to private message a 30 year old to begin with?!

          Edit: and I’m sure twitch found more dirt going through all his communications. This pedo was even planning a meet up with this minor before the minors parent put a stop to it and notified twitch.

          • pelotron@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Beware that points like this suggest that messaging platforms should be monitoring all communications sent between users. If that’s the world you want to live in, ok, fine… But in this case the guy that committed the crime is the one who has been punished. Isn’t that the correct result?

            • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              I’m just saying that, maybe if you are a creator making content primarily watched by children, the trade off for making money (millions in this case.) off of our platform, is we get to monitor your communications with said audience on our platform? It’s like saying a banker who uses their work email to coordinate a crime. My work has email monitoring that looks for financial crimes because surprisingly people are dumb enough to use work email for elicit activities. Yes his messages to individuals are “private” but should they be when in a position of power? He messaged a minor through twitches chat (twitch is essentially his whole job) and twitch has NO safeguards to prevent abuse?!

    • TheBest@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think they kept it on the low because they don’t want people realizing that they’re viewing the contents of their whispers, even if you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

    • Xer0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Everyone will forget about twitch’s involvement within a week. Just like every time literally any big event happens with any company.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Fine. I won’t pick a side. I won’t crucify anyone without evidence. So…release the transcripts. That seems like the logical step.

    • Master@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Twitch settled with him instead of losing in arbitration for banning him. I want to see the the transcripts. It sounds like part of his settlement was that he couldn’t talk about it but ex twitter employees violated the nda. That’s a lot of work on twitches side to keep it hushed which makes this weirder.

      He’s a massive pos so it Wouldn’t surprise me if he did do something worthy of this witch hint but damnit i want to see the texts before i burn him when twitch is being so weird about it.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s a lot of work on twitches side to keep it hushed which makes this weirder.

        I don’t think that’s weird, twitch really doesn’t want the pr of being wrong or having a pedo on their platform, its a lose-lose and I would expect them to try and cover it up regardless.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The transcripts won’t be released unless they’re leaked. Giving out any details about the minor he was chatting with risks exposing the victim, who is possibly still a minor. Releasing the transcripts would be an incredibly damaging move, and not to Beahm; people would almost certainly doxx the kid immediately, possibly putting them at even greater risk of harm than they would have been in to begin with.

      We don’t need to see them, anyway. We’re not involved. We have nothing to gain from reading the details. If self-admitting to having inappropriate conversations with minors isn’t evidence enough to convince you one way or the other, then I really don’t see how reading a sext thread with a child will make much of a difference.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        It was seven years ago. Unless he was talking to a ten year old, they’re not a minor anymore.

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          And if they are…well, first of all, yikes, and second of all his career as a content creator is going to go from “damaged” to “gone” as no platform would let him stream after that.

  • celeste@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Does anyone have a link to a source on the age of the kid? I’m wondering if I’m missing it. People keep saying she’s 17. Was that in one of his edits?