• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think it’s interesting and worthwhile research but I agree with you that they’re overhyping this and it leaves a lot to be desired. To make real dire wolves at minimum we would need much more complete DNA, and maybe more beyond that.

    • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      This was unethical research though. They basically tweaked a few things in a wolf without regard to quality of life.

      And the changes are so superficial that it reminds me of a gimmick to raise more money; I actually looked for references to crypto and block chain, in case they went there too.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Why would a few tweaks negatively affect their quality of life? I completely agree the marketing is scummy and a gimmick but it is the next step in this type of research, if you ignore the spin.

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Physically, hips. Bane of larger wolves. Then we have how that new fur changes their comfort and heat regulation . It’s more than cosmetic: hundreds of variables

          Then there is psychology: how all this affects their feelings, how it affects other wolves interacting with them.

          Notice the pups are bottle fed: lack of maternal care. Having taken in many dogs, I know that really is important. Then, finally isolation.

          Given how the press release and non peer reviewed paper overhypes. I’m not sure if I would want these people to be my vet, never mind dna tinkers.