• butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      But that inherently means liberal, no? I was under the impression that social democrats supported private ownership of the means of production. If you believe that should be illegal doesn’t that mean you can’t be a social Democrat?

        • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Fair enough, I guess I find myself in an awkward place between socdem and socialist then, but the more radical end of the reformist spectrum fits. Not sure what to call that, other than reformism vaguely inspired by more libertarian socialism and sub-municipalism.