• oshu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Every project eventually makes their own package manager. Its pretty insane if you stop and think about how routinely the package manager is re-invented.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      For real. I don’t mind the million distributions, but can we agree on one single package manager?

      • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Where is that comic about standards now that we need it? The one where they create a new standard that is going to solve all the problems, except for now there is just one more standard??

        Edit: https://xkcd.com/927

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Back in 2000 I started using Linux with RedHat (That’s what they were teaching us in college then.) and got to know RPMs before the automatic package dependency resolution tools. Then I moved to Ubuntu in 2004 and have been using that since, and even had a job where I built custom Linux distros based on Debian where I had to build DEB packages, so I got to know that system pretty well.

          But, honestly, if there are better package managers out there I wouldn’t mind changing if it means we all use the same thing.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’ve broken both Fedora and Ubuntu already, so I had to find better solutions. With NixOS I can roll back to a previous revision easily on boot

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I don’t know if Flatpak can cover all the scenarios. It seems to be mostly for Desktop apps. I know Ubuntu was able to have system tools installed with Snaps though. However, having apps installed with their dependencies in one package is neat, but it takes a ton more in storage.

          Flatpak is a great extra layer to have on top of a regular package manager, but I wouldn’t use it as a sole package management system.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Not really

      There are only a few mainstream package formats and ultimately you are going to probably be using distro packages or portable formats like Flatpak.