Most surfaces in space look like a quarry. So that’s fair. You could also include the ones that are on fire and the ones inside of some sort of toxic cloud.
But the exceptions are the most interesting parts. There’s a reason there’s not much entertainment out there about people stranded in deserts, mountains, and open oceans that feature not a single encounter with life.
I’ve played Star Citizen, roaming dead space and lifeless planets gets old fast.
I mean, space also looks like this:
Point being: the statement “space looks like X” doesn’t make any sense because space looks like literally everything.
I mean, space doesn’t look like anything.
Also true. Even truer, in fact. Still validates classic Dr. Who having trash production design.
What do you mean “Dr. Who trash production design”? I really can’t understand why you would say “Dr Who trash production design”! /s
Then what are the lines on on my graph for huh!? Dummy
Most surfaces in space look like a quarry. So that’s fair. You could also include the ones that are on fire and the ones inside of some sort of toxic cloud.
But the exceptions are the most interesting parts. There’s a reason there’s not much entertainment out there about people stranded in deserts, mountains, and open oceans that feature not a single encounter with life.
I’ve played Star Citizen, roaming dead space and lifeless planets gets old fast.
Is most surface area on planets/asteroids, or on stars?
Walkable and filmable? It would be the rocky ones.
Tecnically, this photo is taken in space.
All photos are