• Oneser@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I mean… It does apply though?.. It shouldn’t, but it does.

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      In my comment what I mean by the word “apply” is that resources are allocated effectively, which they are not without heavy regulation, and at that point it is no longer the free market that is allocating the resources.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      If we’re talking about efficient price discovery, it doesn’t apply to necessities. Supply and demand doesn’t just mean “Some people sell things, other people buy them”, it refers to specific emergent dynamics in markets. One of the essential parts of supply and demand is the ability of the consumer to abstain from a purchase which is more expensive than they’re willing to pay.

      iPhones don’t cost $10,000 because if they did, most people wouldn’t buy them. This doesn’t work for things you need, like housing or medicine, because you can’t just choose not to buy them, no matter the cost. That removes the downward pressure that validates supply and demand curves.

      • Oneser@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Is this not simply covered by elasticity? E.g. if housing was $50,000 a month, most people would be homeless, even if it is a “need”.