This looks like propoganda. The article makes unsubstantiated claims without quoting sources, based on a generalized quote that did not say what the article states.
If I wanted news about the subject, I would not go here to get it. Now might be a good time to learn how to block URL’s and certain content here on Lemmy, cause if you fall for the propos this time, how many times have you before and not known it?
Propoganda is very effective, so much so we do it to ourselves. You need better defenses or you’re just going to be the useful idiot for propogandists. Which is exactly why the things we’re seeing these days are happening. pls stp.
“Anyone who is here on a visitor visa who carries out law-breaking will be deported from this country,”
What does this have to do with Palestine? Pierre is not getting my vote but this seems way out of context.
Don’t cherry pick the phrase, give the rest of the context of what he said.
I agree, but does the article? I’ve read it twice and I only see what I quoted.
This looks like propoganda. The article makes unsubstantiated claims without quoting sources, based on a generalized quote that did not say what the article states.
If I wanted news about the subject, I would not go here to get it. Now might be a good time to learn how to block URL’s and certain content here on Lemmy, cause if you fall for the propos this time, how many times have you before and not known it?
Propoganda is very effective, so much so we do it to ourselves. You need better defenses or you’re just going to be the useful idiot for propogandists. Which is exactly why the things we’re seeing these days are happening. pls stp.
Really? Just google “Poilievre deport” and the first two hits are literally:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/canadas-tory-leader-vows-to-deport-foreigners-for-antisemitic-crimes/
https://m.jpost.com/diaspora/article-850082
It’s barely a dogwshitle at this point.