• Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yes, the comment I replied to is technically right in that there are some tiny countries out there. Or they would be, if the rocket in question would’ve been a vastly larger rocket that burned a carbon containing fuel. The New Shepard tourist joyride is tiny for a rocket and its exhaust is water vapour.

        • bravesirthomas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Although I doubt it, hydrogen can be produced using renewables.

          It’s still going to be significantly “greener” than using methane as a propellant, though.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Where did they get all the hydrogen? How did they make the rocket. While it may not emit much carbon on launch day, it will have taken a shit load to produce it.

        • Deme@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I was talking about the direct emissions of launching a rocket. The indirect emissions are obviously vastly larger and might as well include everything in the wider economy that enables stuff like this. Just maintaining the necessary industrial capacity is already a huge strain on the planet. That’s what I’m after with these comments. The rich fucker joyride is a largely inconsequential yet overtly visible result of a bloated system hiding in plain sight. The aerospace sector as a whole is just the tip of the iceberg of a global industrial society in ecological overshoot.