legend

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ah, thanks to those clarifying who this schmuck is.

    At first I wondered if it was the meme author? Lol at getting your headshot out there. Random Asian scientist? Eeeeeh, tip toeing into racist undertones with the repeat posts.

    IRL jackass running unethical and illegal human experimentation? Bring on all the memes and then some.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    The wiki link said he went to prison and is forbidden from practicing. Why is he tweeting this while wearing the proverbial white lab coat?

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      He only got three years but China changed the laws based on this dickhead so now it’s a lot more. In China at least. I’m sure there are plenty of countries where it’s only marginally illegal.

    • hackathy@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      …working at the Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech) in Shenzhen, China…

    • hmonkey@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I feel like I don’t quite get the controversy. I assume it’s mainly that it could’ve gone horribly wrong? But then so do natural conceptions… Reminds me of the ethics of self-driving cars

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        … You’re sweeping thousands of years of technology being considered “playing God” under the rug like that’s not a thing. Even though in this case, the phrase couldn’t get closer to being accurate.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        There’s a reason we have ethical standards when conducting experiments on living creatures. I don’t really feel like that needs to be explained.

        As for yourself self driving car example, well, unfortunately Tesla has skipped a lot of stages and just threw their shit on the road and people have died because of it. So not exactly the best example. You can do things incrementally and safely and achieve the results you want. It just cost money and time. And when lives are at stake I don’t feel like we should be pennypinching.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s also extra fucked that he essentially experimented on what are now small children’s lives without any concern that it might severely impact them in unforeseen ways, for the rest of their existence. And all for questionable gain because he apparently didn’t really achieve the objective of making them immune to HIV.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        The issue is that this guy just kind of did it without going through any of the normal check steps to make sure he was doing it right or there wouldn’t be any unexpected consequences

        • hmonkey@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          That’s true. I guess I just figured this type of thing is inevitable, and that the first person to do it would kind of have to be a mad scientist. Like if it wasn’t him it’d be someone else, so idk. Probably not a great guy in any case

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            No there absolutely is a way without unconsented human experiments. You can go slow and prove every step of your procedure is save (enough) before doing it. That way you dont have to lie to the other people involved.

            • hmonkey@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              I’m aware that it can (and should) be done ethically, but it seems inevitable that a mad scientist will make a lot of the initial discoveries due to all the red tape around “playing God” and general public disgust at the idea of genetic modifications.