You must log in or register to comment.
8-1. Clarance Toad being the only dissenting opinion and he will write an essay about for 30 pages. Saying nothing but that he should have never been confirmed. Thanks Joe Biden.
The answer is fucking no, obviously.
If it were obvious to them, they wouldn’t be hearing arguments.
Yeah, cause they need to figure out how to get Trump what he wants even though it’s clearly dead-brained as fuck.
Yes, that’s what I’m saying.
feel like this is the first headline I’ve seen to use “oral arguments”
That supreme court vernacular. There are many written arguments made prior to the case being heard, then they “hear oral arguments” in court before making a ruling.