• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Way more movies in lower resolution. Your brain and mind will fill in the blanks automatically and lack of perfect visual acuity doesn’t take away from the story one bit.

  • Ydna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I used to watch movies and shows on my computer monitor, in which case 720 was mostly acceptable. Though a few years ago I switched to a NAS for storage and I use a typical TV instead… now I don’t feel the need to use smaller filesizes. I tend to go with 1080 by default. The NAS is really a godsend… you can fill that thing up with whatever your want and still have room to spare.

  • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Definitely more at lower. I see zero point in going above 1080p and for lesser media I do 720. I have 16tb of 720-1080 stuff.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I agree with people saying at least 1080p but more. Upscaling is quite good now and makes little difference for the enjoyment of a film whether you can read the newspaper on the desk in the corner… Unless you’re a film buff who likes Easter eggs maybe

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If I were to prepare for the internet to be out, I would most likely do the following:

    I would go with a mix of 720 for most movies/shows and my favorites at 1080. I would also go for a collection of my favorite music.

    Then as an extra download Wikipedia and some Ted talks, and a bunch of YouTube videos to watch offline. I guess some e-books and or PDF. Maybe download some memes and stuff to laugh at.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t want to go lower than 1080p. Having said that, there are compression formats that can get you respectable 1080p but in smaller file sizes (1-2GB).

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lower res, for sure. Modern GPUs/drivers and some media players can do a decent job of making them a bit nicer to look at ‘on-the-fly’, too.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can watch content in lower resolutions, I can’t watch content that I don’t have access to at all.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’d include video games.

      You can get a small roguelike that’ll provide a ton of playtime.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A couple emulators and a few console’s entire collection of games takes up a surprisingly small amount of space.

      • ilhamagh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think I’m in this camp. I can juggle a few roguelikes if I want to check-out from reality. My guitar/piano would be my priority though, maybe I can actually finish writing the damned song.

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Depends on the stuff and on what you will be watching it.

    TV shows that were originally aired in SD will be fine in low resolution. Cartoons can usually be pretty low quality too. Old cartoons in SD on a CRT usually look great.

    However stuff made for HD will probably need better quality to be enjoyable.

    I’ve been collecting since the days of RealPlayer and still have lots of stuff in SD. Some shows are getting difficult to watch on a giant screen but the advantage of the small files is that they can be read by a toaster.

    TLDR: More in lower resolution unless it’s some modern shows or movies where HD is a necessity.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah there’s definitely diminishing returns but if you go too low it starts looking like shit enough to matter. 720p is probably my cutoff for that too.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah, you just grab a shitload of podcasts.

        That is 0p resolution, and you can store a huge number of them on a small disk.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    More stuff in lower resolution, and focus on less-popular (or less-collectible) material.

    The internet isn’t going to go out just for you, it’s going to go out for everyone (at least in your region). You’re going to be without it for the long-term, so you’ll want variety in what you can watch and listen to. But your friends and family will also be looking for entertainment, so you’ll be providing for a range of tastes over a long period.

    You want to focus on less-popular / less-collectible material because trading networks will spring up, and the less-popular material will be the stuff that’s in demand. There’ll be plenty of people with a full collection of Star Trek or all the Best Picture winners, that kind of thing. But there’ll also be people who suddenly realize that they want to re-watch all of Law and Order or they’ve always meant to watch Miami Vice and now is the perfect time.

    I’ll also point out that you’ve hypothesized that it’s just the internet that’s gone down. There would still be broadcast tv and radio, and I think people would re-adapt to broadcast viewing and listening.

  • quediuspayu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m completely fine sacrificing resolution. I don’t care about 4k resolutions at all, from where I sit to watch I can barely see the fly poops near the corners of the screen, and those are huge compared to the size of the pixels.