• make -j8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    He is 20yo. He s not a child. You don’t emprison people because their adult kid did some shit

    You are saying nonsense

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was a parents unsecured weapon used in that shooting. So yes, they should be held responsible.

      • make -j8@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        on the basis “serious negligence leading to death”, yes I agree with you. but not “because they re his parents”

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Of course. But the point was that just because he is an adult, his parents are not excluded from being at fault. Their fault is the neglience, at least before the law.

          That it takes f-ed up parents to rise a f-ed up kid is another matter.

          • make -j8@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Oh yeah i see now. Ha! who said two people can never agree on Internet, even when started with what seemed like opposite sides.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Some are faster, some are slower at growing up and fixing grown up at is 18 is a legal compromise. He might well have been still a kid.