• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I have — at one point or another, I’m pretty sure that I’ve tried every Linux virtual terminal program out there that’s been packaged for major distros in the past twenty years — but it was some time back, and I don’t remember specifics. For me, time to start and text throughput was a pretty dominant factor, and urxvt (for X11) or foot (for Wayland) ranked highly there.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Don’t take this as zinging alacrity as unusual or whatever. I mean, I don’t care about tabs, for example, because I do “tabs” inside the terminal, using tmux, so I’m fine using something like urxvt, foot, or alacrity, but many people don’t, and care a bunch about having multiple tabs in a virtual terminal program. Time to open terminals, which I care about, may not matter much if you launch them with the mouse instead of whacking a key combination – by the time your fingers get back to the keyboard, the terminal is probably up.

        Most virtual terminal programs work more-or-less the same way, outside something exotic like cool-retro-term, and you’ll be fine with choosing any of them.

        • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah I didn’t read it as a negative at all, but thanks for explaining anyway. Never got to the point of seriously trying tmux yet, but I will eventually. I understand it does more than just “tabs in your terminal”.