• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Legally I think a resignation is valid upon delivery. CCing the new employer on a resignation email that specifies the effective date should solve your friend’s dilemma. OTOH if he continues to accept payments it would be an acknowledgement of continued employment - which the new employer wouldn’t know about but could be used by the previous employer if there’s ever any sort of legal dispute in which his exact end date is important.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I think the move would probably be to send the letter, begin new employment, and then set aside any further payments he receives from the job he resigned from for reimbursement. On the other hand, have fun with the nightmare of returning the funds to the FDA, and also tax season and…yeah nevermind fuck that.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        set aside any further payments he receives from the job he resigned from for reimbursement

        In a sane world the smart thing to do would be to put it into an index fund, but of course with Herr Gröpenfuhrer in charge, chances are SPY tanks again and they’d lose the money

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Can’t start? It’s their problem if they can’t process your resignation.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If the job is in an industry regulated by the fda it can be considered a conflict of interest and normal government employees would need to have that approved by an ethics committee

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Until the resignation is processed they are an employee hence the paycheck. It’s an anti corruption regulation otherwise a person could get a job at a pharma company and on their last day at the fda try and push a bunch of approvals through. That type of corruption is reserved for members of congress, president, Supreme Court, and of course the special government employee

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nah. Just because they still have you on payroll and haven’t pulled your door card and logon does not mean you’re still an employee. Resigned is resigned, whether the employer decides to handle their internal paperwork or stop paying you is irrelevant.

            • BussyCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’m on my phone and don’t have the effort required to make the meme but until it’s processed it’s as official as Michael Scott’s “I declare bankruptcy”.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Pretty sure there’s no rule against having two jobs, especially if you don’t have to go to one of them.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Exactly. I don’t know American laws, but I would submit my resignation by registered letter (I assume there are still doormen to receive those), and if they kept paying me I would put the cash in a savings account in case they ever remember to read the mail and notice they were paying me after quitting.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s not moving from one company to another.

        It’s moving from the government regulator to a company regulated by that former employer. The rules on government conflicts of interest still apply, and you can’t accept a paycheck from a regulated entity while you’re still technically employed at the regulator.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Assuming laws still matter, of course. It is 2025, after all. We’re in the age of “What are you going to do if I don’t?”

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think it would probably be safer just to not cash the check from the previous employer.

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My wife had a coworker Rif’d and is in the same situation. It is not fake, this is really happening to real people.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I know several people in this category: still employed by the government and subject to government ethics rules, unhireable by any company that still needs to follow that government agency’s rules about conflicts of interest.

        • thanks AV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Hilarious to imagine corporations respecting the sanctity of “conflict of interest” in hiring govt employees, especially in 2025. Think of the optics!

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yes, I don’t think you can be in limbo for more than the statutory 2-weeks notice period or some such.

      Still, there’s going to be quite some extra cost associated with the heads-over-heels way in which contracts were cancelled.

      • Raltoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Probably fake, but to be fair, the government isn’t exactly following the rules these days.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s in line with what I’ve heard. People have been commuting to work only to find that they can’t get in.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      When I worked for a state university it was common knowledge that some people stopped showing up to work and have been getting paid for years. Usually they go on medical leave or vacation and just never come back. We had a list of ones we knew or suspected because every time we would do backend changes requiring lists of active employees those people’s data would throw wrenches into the system. We weren’t allowed to not include them in things because they were still employed

      So it could be fake but also the government already doesn’t know what it’s doing on the best of days and these are not the best of days

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If people can secretly work two simultaneous full time jobs, you can work a different job while collecting the paycheck for the job you left but they won’t process the resignation for.

    • entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Apparently not if one paycheck is from the government and the other is from a company that works with the government.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not works with the government, is regulated by said part of the government. It’s a pretty common sense regulation because of the conflict of interest when you could be both overseeing a company and working for it. Same reason presidents before the orange turd have historically placed their assets in a blind trust.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I TOLD you ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS were WASTING Taxpayer Dollars! But he’s WHITE and RICH so I DONT CARE! DEPORT BROWN US CITIZENS INSTEAD!