return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoHakeem Jeffries makes it clear he’ll stand by incumbent House Dems and pushes back on progressiveswww.politico.comexternal-linkmessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkHakeem Jeffries makes it clear he’ll stand by incumbent House Dems and pushes back on progressiveswww.politico.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square166fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agohttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/democratic-party-hits-new-polling-low-voters-want-fight-trump-harder-rcna196161 Here’s a source for the 27% figure. Now where’s your source?
minus-squareUsernameHere@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoThe person that posted that number wasn’t you. How could you know their source unless you are using it as an alt account or lying?
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoThere’s this thing on the internet called a search engine. I just looked up “democrats 27%” without the quotes. Now where’s your source?
minus-squareUsernameHere@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoWhy the progressive ‘Squad’ is getting smaller after defeats this primary cycle
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 day agoThat’s odd. I don’t see a listed approval rating. You said it was lower and I would like to compare the numbers. All that article tells me is that AIPAC can buy primary candidates.
minus-squareUsernameHere@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoI can’t understand the source for you
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoYou don’t even understand it for yourself. You just post links and assert that they support your false claims when they just don’t. Bet you didn’t even read it.
minus-squareUsernameHere@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoYou want me to read it for you too?!
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoHow about you read it for you? You clearly haven’t yet. Were you just posting links and expecting no one to read them and call you out on it?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/democratic-party-hits-new-polling-low-voters-want-fight-trump-harder-rcna196161
Here’s a source for the 27% figure. Now where’s your source?
The person that posted that number wasn’t you. How could you know their source unless you are using it as an alt account or lying?
There’s this thing on the internet called a search engine. I just looked up “democrats 27%” without the quotes.
Now where’s your source?
Why the progressive ‘Squad’ is getting smaller after defeats this primary cycle
That’s odd. I don’t see a listed approval rating. You said it was lower and I would like to compare the numbers.
All that article tells me is that AIPAC can buy primary candidates.
I can’t understand the source for you
You don’t even understand it for yourself. You just post links and assert that they support your false claims when they just don’t. Bet you didn’t even read it.
You want me to read it for you too?!
How about you read it for you? You clearly haven’t yet.
Were you just posting links and expecting no one to read them and call you out on it?