• nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Kropotkin is wrong, the data existed but it was made usable in a new way by methods which would not have existed without this company.

    Secondly, open source is not the only ethical form of technology, that’s an inherently biased and simplistic way to think. In fact, having access to some types of tech or information can make the world less safe or more unethical.

    Edit corrected sentence, and lol @ downvoters constantly butthurt that their Marxist pov is challenged

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What if you don’t want to make your data usable by AI chatbots, is that not your right?

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Kropotkin died in 1921 so you’d be explaining it to him using wireless radio or telegram cables or similar.

      A newspaperman has invented a new way to transmit the encyclopedia over the radio without you having to visit a library. A machine like a very complicated typewriter takes your cable and returns the entry from the encyclopedia to you immediately. They charge for this service but do not pay the encyclopedia writer, and the ink for the typewriter is made by burning down a forest and polluting a river. The newspaperman also takes the labor of his employees for profit and directs the government in his whims, and frequently changes the output of the encyclopedia to meet his political ends.

      While you may disagree those are bad things, it would certainly be consistent with Kropotin’s world view to he against it.