• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Elissa Slotkin can fuck off.

    Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency…

    Oh, she can really fuck off.

    Edit:

    “I can’t do what she does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist,” she concluded.

    This is code for not rocking the boat.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure stop pamdering to the wealthy and make plans to support and luft the general populace in all areas and you will stop being “woke”.
    And guess what, the best way to pay for it is to get the fiar share of taxes back from those that are avoiding paying completely by paying laakers privately.

    Wow, so easy, much fun.

  • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    First part of article title is a bit misleading I think. She thinks “Kings” is a better term than oligarchy because it’s more relatable. She has a plan to fight kings. She does seem to think wokeness is weak though.

    Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) has urged her Democratic colleagues to stop attacking the “oligarchy” on Thursday, arguing that the word did not resonate with most Americans and should be replaced with “kings.”

    Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) – argued that the Democratic Party needed to lose its “weak and woke” reputation and “fucking retake the flag,” adopting a “goddamn Alpha energy” inspired by Detroit Lions coach Dan Campbell.

    “She said Democrats should stop using the term ‘oligarchy,’ a phrase she said doesn’t resonate beyond coastal institutions, and just say that the party opposes ‘kings,'” wrote Wren, who reported that Slotkin was planning to deliver a series of speeches in the coming months about her plan.

  • tronx4002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems to be an unpopular opinion, but she is right. I think the people upset with her in the comments do not live in red areas.

    As stupid as it sounds, that is all people seem to care about. The right used to have abortion as a drum to bang. Now that Roe is overturned the right needed a new social cause, and they found ‘woke’ which is WAY more effective than abortion since it seems to excite both religious, and non-religious.

    If you go and talk with people in rural areas you will be shocked by how prominent this issue is in peoples minds, and I believe it will always beat economic issues for them.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Democrats win by turning out people who otherwise don’t vote. If they aren’t already turned on by republicans talking like this, will those people see this as anything other than Democrats talking down to them?

    • michel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is the electoral system. In a system that allows for voting for smaller parties without wasting your vote, the US would probably have 4-5 parties at least. Red state moderates would not be lumped together with progressives, and main street Republicans with the evangelical wing with MAGA

    • asim0v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s prominent in people’s minds because it has been spoon-fed to them by propaganda machines masquerading as actual media controlled by… drumroll oligarchs!

      Source: I live in a deep red area in TX. It’s scary the shit people believe because they saw it on Fox News, OAN, or a myriad of bullshit online outlets.

      • tronx4002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        100%. When having this debate I always bring up that the actual “woke” legislation being passed is at best minimal and pandering, and has 0 effect on most people lives. It is a fictional boogie meant to fill the void of abortion as an issue.

        But right wing media has been extremely successful and making it seem like this is all the left thinks about. In that sense it is true that the AOC/Sanders tour is a great way to reclaim the conversation, but it is also true that the left needs to fight the narrative that they are the woke party if they want to stop America’s rightward drift.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Of course. They don’t want to fix things, they just want to be the ones getting the benefits.

  • SpaceShort@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Democratic Party is so full of collaborationists. Just shows how democracy and capitalism are incompatible. The bourgeois class just buy the politicians.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fighting Oligarchy resonates greatly. But yes, the dems have focused too much on the culture war in favour of participating in the class war against the working class.

    That is definitely something they should put waaaay more focus on. Trump is the cry for help of much of the working class, if people would believe you actually fought FOR the working people in your country, the dems would be unstoppable.

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So sad that people are still trying to fix this shitparty that is working perfectly as they intended.
      But americans are incapable of change and voting for 3rd party apparently.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      But yes, the dems have focused too much on the culture war

      No, republicans focus on the culture war. democrats are playing defense. Well, if you call forfeiting “playing defense.”

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fucking nailed it. Also need to get the assholes who think everything is solved with protests to sit the fuck down

  • Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    She’s sorta right. ‘Oligarchy’ is a big college word that Joe Bumblefuck doesn’t understand.

    Aristocrats is a good word, but again: “duh?”

    Therefore Dems just need to start harping about “rich fucking parasites”

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yep, this is a branding issue.

      Oligarchy => “rich fucking parasites”

      Woke = equality (equity too, but stick with equality for sake of simplicity)

    • kipo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. She’s talking about changing optics and messaging to something that resonates with the larger ‘I know very little about politics but I still vote’ group of voters.

      The headline feels like clickbait.

    • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      People are clued in on oligarchy even if they don’t quite know the exact definition. After Bernie and AOC started their tour, it was Wikipedia top 5 articles. Slotkin is just a right wing traitor.