EDIT: If the elections.ca website is down for you, see here

Election Information

I recommend that you check the links yourself! I’ve copied some of the information below:

Ways to vote

See this page for full details.

Vote on election day (April 28)

Vote by mail

Special Ballots

Remember: Once you apply to vote by special ballot, you can’t change your mind and vote at advance polls or on election day.

See this page for deadlines for when you can apply for one, and when they must receive it by. It also has information on what you must do differently when filling out this ballot: https://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=vote&dir=spe&document=index&lang=e

If you are having any issues, reach out to your local Elections Canada office to know your options.

Data on your district:

Find your riding, your local Elections Canada office, and your candidates by using the search on the homepage: elections.ca

You can also use the detailed search at: elections.ca/scripts/vis/FindED

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    LPC+NDP could be 171 and be ok on current numbers, with the 1 GRN projected reaching a majority without needing BQ. Still…they’re 1 short of that.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      1 short may as well be 2 short, because the house will elect a liberal speaker and reduce the vote number one more. But, whatever will happen is set in stone, waiting to be counted. I don’t know why I engage with this as if its a story unfolding, like I can influence it by watching.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        because the house will elect a liberal speaker and reduce the vote number one more

        Oh, is that not built-in to the 172 requirement? In Australia we always talk about a requirement of 76 seats to win an election, because 75 after the speaker is selected is able to have control of Parliament. I assumed the CBC and others were doing the same here.

        edit: actually, just ran the numbers. 343 seats total, minus one for speaker, halved is 171. Assuming Canadian speakers follow Speaker Denison’s Rule, exactly half isn’t enough, so you need 172. So it looks like it is built in.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We’ve still got those advance polls keeping things in flux, though. A Liberal majority hasn’t even been ruled out.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Have there been estimates of how many advance polls there have been, as a percentage of estimated overall turnout?

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I’m going to bed pretty quick, but CBC just said that it’s about a 2,000 voter jump for the left when that advanced poll comes in, based on the ridings that are done. So, about 1.6% in a 125,000 person riding, or actually more because voting isn’t mandatory.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          As a percentage of turnout, not off the top of my head. It was 7.2 million advance voters in a nation of 41.7 million, though. So, a lot.