• Barometer3689@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    jesus I feel old, and I am only in my 30s. I remember not having apt. How young are linux users nowadays?

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I got tennis shoes older than you, (literally a pair of original Converse I bought new back in the 1970s). I was there before the original chains of Unix, DOS, and finally Linux were foraged. I saw OS2 die in battle. And I saw the dark time of when paper and pencils and slide rules vanished from this earth.

      The knowledge of apt-get and apt only matters to those warriors of the Cli when they wield the sword of sudo to vanquish the evils that exist when upgrading. For they do the bidding of the dark wizards of Dev, holders of the command su.

      Now that I have demonstrated my age by showing everyone how senile I am. ‘apt install’ is aimed at users to give a nicer response to it’s use. It need not be backwards compatible either. ‘Apt-get install’ is older and is meant to be usable as a lower level command and to work with other APT based tools.

      What does this mean for you today? Not a damn thing. I still always type: sudo apt-get install when using a deb based dsitro out of sheer habit. But it’s not needed the vast majority of the unwashed masses. So feel free to just type apt install to help prevent carpel finger nail.

    • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      jesus I feel old, and I am only in my 30s. I remember not having apt. How young are linux users nowadays?

      Well… how old were you when you got your first computer? That young.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Dicey proposition, some mid and older genX grew up before home computers were commonplace.

        When I was in my tweens, only really affluent people had computers. Schools had one single computer in a classroom or maybe a couple in a lab, and almost no one was computer literate.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Nah a lot of people now think screen time is bad without evidence. Never would be allowed to get on a computer at 3-4.

        • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Nah a lot of people now think screen time is bad without evidence. Never would be allowed to get on a computer at 3-4.

          You had your own computer before you could read…?

          • easily3667@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I didn’t claim to understand it but I do claim to remember my sister trying to explain it to me, and that computer only existed during a certain time period.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Excessive screen time at 3 is bad, and we do have evidence. Computers from the 80s we grew up with have nothing in common with today’s highly advanced skinner boxes. It has been so since the age of TV, but today’s tech is worse. They fuck up cognitive and social development really bad. Using screens from time to time is fine, but having a tablet in your face every waking minute hurts even adults.