A family says their newborn son nearly bled to death and is fighting for his life after he was circumcised at a New York City hospital.

Tim and Gabrielle Groth said their son, Cole, underwent the circumcision at NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital in Manhattan, where he was born on March 31.

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    Until about a year ago or something I didn’t even know that it’s such a common practice in the USA. For me it always was just a religios thing of Jews and for some rare medical cases where the foreskin opening is too tight.

    But now I know that it’s apparently considerd normal? dafuq

    Be assured it’s defenetly not in germany unless you are jewish.

  • sploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There’s a really easy way to tell whether or not you should decide to circumcise a penis. First, check if it’s your penis. If it isn’t your penis, don’t circumcise it BECAUSE THAT IS NOT YOUR DICK AND YOU DO NOT GET TO DECIDE WHICH FLESH BELONGS AND WHICH DOESN’T ON IT.

  • misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In parenting classes in my liberal area, the nurses will say “I’m required to tell you that circumcision has medical benefits”. Then they fume how it’s based off bad research and cut themselves short. “However it’s not like your son will be lined up for a nude photo. You can break the cycle of trauma”. I’m lucky to live here.

      • AceSLive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        Not for the newborn it isn’t. Something as personal as your own genetals should be your own personal choice, but in this instance the owner of the penis gave no consent.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, the first time I heard of people protesting against “mutilating children’s genitals [in North America]”, I thought it was a protest against circumcision. I thought, “Wow, we’re finally moving society forward!”

          …nope. It was backwards again.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The only reason a scalpel should be anywhere near a person’s genitals is to treat a serious health issue. Which includes dysphoria.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I married a woman of jewish descent, she’s not religious in any way though. It was alarming, the amount of people coming up to us and asking us about our child’s dick. Why do people think it’s any of their business? Since they over stepped and asked, I gave them the full answer, complete with how idiotic it is and how anyone who still practices it is a backwards ass religious nut, and how all those other reasons like hygiene are bullshit myths.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As a Jewish person im absolutely ashamed that my people still practice mutilation. When a tradition causes severe medical problems it should not continue.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s not even strictly a Jewish thing, as much as it is just an American thing at this point. My parents were only mildly Christian and got me circumcised at the recommendation of the doctor. They didn’t really think much about it because being circumcised is just “the norm”. My dad is circumcised, and my mom said she wanted to make sure I looked like my father (why she expected me to be catching so many glances of dad-dong in life, I’ll never know).

      That said, whether or not it should be, a circumcision is still a very routine procedure, so it’s kinda astounding that they botched it so badly. Hopefully the kid makes it without any lasting damage.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s ironic because the whole reason I’m even here on lemmy is because I was permabanned from reddit for telling someone to crawl back in their hole because they were defending circumcision while claiming female genital mutilation was abhorrent. As if mutilating a penis is perfectly fine but don’t dare mutilate a vulva.

    I know this isn’t the main topic here but it just reminds me that body shaming men is okay but body shaming women isn’t. Especially when it comes to sex organs.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I feel like your argument loses something by being stated backwards. It (and Hacksaws reply) comes off sounding like you are more angry at women than the patriarchy and want to be able to mutilate and body shame them. Rather than what I hope and assume is the case, that you want all genitals protected from mutilation and shaming.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah maybe I missed the /s but I just wanted to show that body shaming and genital mutilation is fucked up and society’s (patriarchy) acceptance of it against men is pretty shitty overall. It would be much better if nobody got body shamed or mutilated non-consentually.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m just bringing up the double standard. You’re correct in your assumption that I don’t want ANY genitals being mutilated.

        But it’s not patriarchal that circumcision is normalized for aesthetical reasons. Women circumcise their sons because they don’t like uncut penises. I’ve NEVER heard a man say anything like that outside of not wanting their child to feel different because other boys are all circumcised. Women do it for aesthetics. Men do it because of a fear of being different. There’s a difference.

        It shouldn’t be done at all but the idea that uncut penises look gross is inherently a woman thing.

        • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Men do it because of a fear of being different.

          I think a lot of people make a very reasonable argument that a huge reason this anxiety even exists is because of patriarchy

            • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Nobody said it’s a conspiracy. It’s practically a natural phenomenon. Why would anybody be afraid that their child would look different from the other boys? Because they don’t want the other boys to bully him. Why do we all know that the other boys would bully him? Well, the good news is there’s a lot of research on this topic but the unfortunate thing is if you wanna learn more, you’ll have to engage with a word you don’t seem to like for some reason.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’ve never heard a woman say they did or would have their baby boy circumcised because uncircumcised penises are gross, or any other version of aesthetic reasons. The religious reasons are rooted in the patriarchy, as is the “need” to look like one’s father and male relatives.

          In the case of female circumcision, it’s a way of enforcing the position of women as property, making it more apparent if she’s ever had sex so her virginity can be sold to her husband. In its most extreme forms it can require she be cut open in order to give birth, and resewn each time. It can block clumps of menstrual blood and lead to infection and sepsis. In less extreme versions it can prevent her from feeling any pleasure during sex, in order to prevent her from having any except that imposed by her husband.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Aesthetics are the most often cited reason for male circumcision in the USA. It is rarely medically necessary, and only religiously motivated among Jewish people.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Anecdotally, I’ve known more mothers who fought for their child not to be circumcised than fathers. I fully encourage men to put their feet down on this issue too. This is very often a battle that the parent who cares more wins on.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, I love how everyone loves “big dick energy” and “small dick energy”, but if someone said “loose pussy energy” and “tight pussy energy” it’s practically a hate crime lol.