• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s just another example of their incompetence.

    They ought to be proud of labeling the tariffed products, so that customers could easier choose the domestic brands, which supposedly is the point of having the tariffs in the first place.

    Attempting to hide it only shows that they realize how bad the tariffs really are.

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Trump has been bragging about how he would put tariffs on everything for a few years. Why is pointing out the tariffs he is bragging about an act of hostility towards him? You would think he would want his accomplishment to be pointed out.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Keep pissing off the elite, trump,.please keep pissing them off.

    I love how they get poorer and want to get rid of you some way

    • jabeez@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sooooo, the fucking “billionaire” POTUS is somehow NOT “the elite”?? What the actual fuck do you people smoke, and do you know where I can score some? I wish I could be this delusional sometimes.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        He’s costing billionaires loads of money, usually that doesn’t end well… Obe can hope, anyways

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Just like stating COVID-19 wasn’t lethal, and was just the flu. An estimated 400,000 MAGA Cult Members, out of 1 Million US dead from the virus, believed a narcissist with the mind of child who didn’t want to embarrassed by not having a perfect, fawning, adulating audience to his magnificence. RFK Jr. literal stated recently that CVD-19 only killed “Old People.” Yeah, idiot, some of those old people were someone’s grandparents, parents, aunts, uncles, friends, and some of them believed an idiot who told them to take horse dewormer, or fish aquarium chloride to cure it.

    This is the same thing. These people are psychopaths.

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I do so wish they would. Certain they won’t.

    Bezos bent knee & kissed the ring. Chances he’ll grow a spine? 1 in a few million.

  • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level in 40 years?” Leavitt asked during a press briefing.

    Because Biden didn’t start a trade war?

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    “The team that runs our ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products. This was never approved and is not going to happen,” said Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesperson.

    Lmao some poor team gets thrown under the bus

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, it’s never going to happen in the first place

      «Amazon moved to distance itself from the report, saying the idea had been considered by Amazon Haul, the company’s recently launched low-cost shopping hub, but had been rejected.

      “The team that runs our ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products. This was never approved and is not going to happen,” said Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesperson."

    • Novocirab@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Thoughts on how to make this happen:

      • Ask your local cashiers and other store clerks how come the prices rose, and whether that really is all tariffs. Again and again. And ideally so that other shoppers overhear it.

      • Make angry social media posts explicitly asking the same, explicitly tagging your local store and/or the chain to which they belong, and muse about looking into their competitors.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I get that you want to aggrieve the owners but that last • tactic feeds into Reichwingers absolving Trump. Asking in person, where they have a chance to say, “yes, see this here is the tariffs amount” puts the blame where it belongs (and can also bring price-gouging into the light, because for sure some will happen).

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
        To call upon a neighbour and to say:–
        "We invaded you last night–we are quite prepared to fight,
        Unless you pay us cash to go away."

        And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
        And the people who ask it explain
        That you’ve only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
        And then you’ll get rid of the Dane!

        It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
        To puff and look important and to say:–
        "Though we know we should defeat you,
        we have not the time to meet you.
        We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

        And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
        But we’ve proved it again and again,
        That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
        You never get rid of the Dane.

        It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
        For fear they should succumb and go astray;
        So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
        You will find it better policy to say:–

        "We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
        No matter how trifling the cost;
        For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
        And the nation that plays it is lost!"

        - Rudyard Kipling

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        “but all I wanted was an even more negative tax rate and to be able to fire workers for getting hurt on the job! I didn’t want the dictator to threaten me with the window treatment”

      • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The dude looks like he keeps a half billion in cash on him at all times to try and buy his way out of the angry mob(s) that will eventually come for him… Because he’s that much of a doucher.

        What’s really insane is that even with all his money, the best he can do for a wife is some kind of plastic surgery experiment that looks like it came out of the Tool Prison Sex music video.

        Just so afraid of losing a small amount of the fortune he can’t spend in his lifetime, that he’s given up the true power that comes with that type of wealth. The power to help

        • sir_pronoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Hey, talk for yourself, there are a lot of us who would love to be married to anything from a Tool video, and we don’t like being insulted

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maybe this will show him that you can’t buy Trumps loyalty because he has no loyalty. However, I have my doubts that even Trump going from going from “My good buddy Bezos” to “Amazon is the enemy” in the course of a day will be enough of a object lesson for Bozos.

          • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            I know, but but even so the whiplash move from “best buddy” to “enemies list” (and probably back again after this capitulation) should tell anyone who wants to ally with Trump what a futile of a move that is. It doesn’t matter how much you schmooze him, how give him, or how much he owes you; the moment you’re not useful to him Trump will throw you under the bus.

    • qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Seemingly because their stock price started to fall due to the Trump admin’s reaction. Which, what? Why would that negatively impact their stock?

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes, keep making enemies of the billionaires that got this administration into office and spent millions of dollars to do so. I’d very much love that for you.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The billionaires have thus far been too cheap to amass private armies to directly enforce their own will. Why, when you can lobby Congress for the price of a used Hyundai Sonata to get the Army to do what you want?

      The government holds the power of violence and Trump holds the power of the government. The billionaires will be reminded of that if they get out of line. Coincidentally, this is the arrangement of modern Russia.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        they have been too cheap thus far.

        I’m pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

        • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Personnel is one thing.

          Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

          They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

          There is a reason they’re all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

          • SaltSong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

            They don’t need one. They need a sniper.

          • CitizenBrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            You can have all the expensive equipment you want. They don’t have the numbers. When your enemies are all around you and this military historically fucking sucks at combating insurgency, you’re going to lose.

            The military would be smart to tell this dude to pound sand before they, and a bunch of people die in a new civil war that they can’t win against the most armed civilian population on the planet.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            this is part of why it’s important for everyone to pay attention to the asymmetric warfare being conducted in Ukraine. for one, it’s a genocide, don’t look away and speak for their liberation just like i hope everyone is speaking up for all colonized peoples, like Mayans, Darfurians, Congolese, Palestinians, and Uyghers. for another the skills demostrated may become necessary in the near future

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Good thing this isn’t a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        That possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          When elections are fraudulent, its the same as no representation. Besides, pretty soon they’ll be suspending elections altogether. It doesn’t get more “no representation” than that.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          In the most literal sense we have representation, but it sure as hell doesn’t seem like it in practice… :(

            • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?

              There’s a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.

              • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                Yes, he was filthy rich, not in liquidity, but in assets.

                But yes, he was approached with the offer to be King of The Colonies, and he refused. We can admire that.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      He’s brought down Tesla (bankrupt in 2 years, MMW), and now Amazon. We shpuld start a betting pool for who-s next. META? Google? Microsoft?

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      In the article, Amazon already back peddled and said it was just in the idea phase and they never really planned on implementing it.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Insane that the rich hate taxes so much, that they’re willing to put literal narcissist criminal idiots in charge thinking “I can definitely control and predict this guy’s behavior and surely that will be good for my business rather than just not having a 37th yacht and paying taxes and making the world an objectively better place not only for the other 7 billion inhabitants but probably more stable for my own interests as well.”

      If we weren’t all being tossed into the furnace with them, it would be something I’d never stop laughing at.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s the crazy part, unless they’re “outlawed” billionaires should try and improve people’s lives since it means they would have more money to spend on the crap those billionaires are selling! It’s hard to sell stuff on Amazon if everyone is struggling to afford housing and food.

        • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          UPS just laid off 20K workers on the expectation that Amazon deliveries will be way down.

          Container ships are down 60%. More than any month during the pandemic.

          Trump is imploding the entire economy.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

          They could work to remove the destitution and desperation of working people. But if their workers weren’t in such dire straits, then they wouldn’t have so much power over them. Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance also have more time to pursue unionization and other political activities. Even if improving the lives of the people would objectively increase the wealth of the ultra-rich, it would still decrease their power. And ultimately, the only reason people ever obtain that level of wealth is because they desire power more than anything else. People who aren’t power-hungry monsters cash out and retire early long before they reach billionaire status.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance are unlikely to pursue unions. That’s the stuff unions are trying to achieve.