Losing everywhere in courts, so now you think you can just sidestep them by changing the constitution? Lolz
Is it "losing* if there’s no consequences? Lol Bro is winning in 4k
Stephen Miller is an evil villain pulled directly out of some children’s cartoon show.
When they talk about being the party of Lincoln this isn’t what I had in mind…
deleted by creator
the administration is under foreign influence, that’s more an ‘invasion’ than the ‘immigration problem’.
deleted by creator
Good! The Founders CLEARLY only Wrote the Constitution to Protect SCHOOL SHOOTERS and LITERALLY nothing Else! So EVERY OTHER PART of the Constitution like writ of habeas corpus can ACTUALLY be IGNORED!
BUT you DARE NOT IGNORE the Part that allows ME, a PRO LIFE REPUBLICAN, to SHOOT UP AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL!
They go this route then the protests every weekend here will become a different kind of rodeo.
If I’m there to peacefully protest and all of a sudden they can grab you a basically kill you (because let’s face it it you get sent to El Salvador or Libia was it? You are dead. You are not getting out), people start packing and right fully so. Miller is a fucking moron and a scum bag.
Because of course they are
I don’t think they have the right to take that away.
They don’t have the right (because it’s illegal) to do a lot of the stuff they’ve done and yet here we are.
They have any and every “right” that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say “You’re a Marxist, I don’t have to listen to you. Fuck you.”
:(
“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it.
It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
I dunno.
The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts.
I think it’s 7-2 against trump.
They do not.
They don’t have the right to deny due process either. Still happening.
but they think they do and that is dangerous
I’m not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don’t care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.
Right… so anarchy it is then.
Sounds like it.
For the new people: Anarchy just means no hierarchy. Not being a dick. Remember that.
Anarchy should always be the goal.
I think you mean disobedience or resistance?
Anarchy for the average person is not about political anarchy but just a word to mean chaos
Which is why we must correct it.
Oh heard. Just thought it might be a linguistic issue
Hah, well, I was kind of paraphrasing a quote in my head I guess. But yes. You are correct.
If that happens I imagine we get a few more people whose red lines have been crossed.
