• the_q@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I mean they were trained on copyrighted material and nothing has been done about that so…

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That is definitely one of the most cooked takes I’ve heard in a while.

        Why would anyone create anything if it can immediately be copied with no compensation to you?

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t see how allowing AI robbery barons to steal copyrighted material would benefit a small fish in the pond of IP

        • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Creation happened before intellectual property laws existed.

          Creation happens that can be immediately copied with no compensation now, open source software is an example.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            17 hours ago

            How many authors do you think would have written the books they did, if they weren’t able to make a living from their work? Most of the people creating works before copyright either had a patron of some description, or outright worked for an organisation.

            • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              The specific works? Who knows. It’s irrelevant

              My point is your original premise was wrong. Creation DID happen without IP laws. People DO create with out the need for compensation/copy protection.

              I propose, people will create things because they always have.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I think copyright should last maximum 10 years. Plenty of time to earn enough from your creation.

          Imagine how advanced we would be, as a civilization, if everything created before 2015 was free for everybody.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Honestly, I think our world would be a lot blander, and we’d have a whole lot less original content.

        • Aux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The original copyright law was created to protect authors from publishers. The current law is an abomination and should be removed.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You’re probably right, but saying we should abolish it altogether is insane. There’s a good reason we have these laws.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          You know that for the vast majority of human history copyright didn’t exist, and yet people still created art and culture, right?

          edit: If you’re gonna downvote, have the balls to explain how I’m wrong.