Other than them both being dickheads

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago
    1. Elon being an annoying jackass around everyone he meets has drawn most people, Trump included, to hate having him around.
    2. Several of Trump’s policies that are unrelated to Elon, negatively effect him and/or Starlink and Tesla
    3. Trump isn’t a traditional white-power nazi. He’s just a racist, old American with zero wunderlust for any Reich, and isn’t going as far as Elon hoped or would himself.
    4. Miscalculating this, Elon is now stuck in a horrible situation of being wrong about his orange would-be Hitler, and the moat he’s dug himself between him, his companies and leftists who otherwise would consume his products.
    5. Doge didn’t find or accomplish anything but dismantle parts of our government that then either had to be band-aided back together by the closest Democrats or Republicans for better and worse.

    Aside from “winning” the election, they’ve both done nothing but step on eachother’s feet and disappoint one another. The levee broke.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Publicly, Elon said Trump’s bill was full of pork and would increase spending and debt by a lot.

    Voters on the right were already waking up to how shitty Trump’s bill was, and Musk just used his megaphone to let even more of Trump’s base know that it sucked.

    Privately, Musk is probably pissed that Trump’s bill didn’t help his companies. These are two greedy assholes. It all comes down to money and ego at the end of the day.

      • zombyreagan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Normal people hate it because it’s gutting things like Medicare, and GOP ghouls hate it because it doesn’t cut enough and will add to the deficit by a lot

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The bill give massive tax cuts to the extremely rich, and it attempts to pay for part of that by:

        • kicking many low income and disabled people off of federally funded health insurance
        • closes poor rural hospitals that depend on Medicaid money
        • cutting subsidies for manufacturing jobs that make emerging green tech, like EVs
        • food and child care assistance will disappear for many poor families.
        • and there is a bunch of weird little sneaky things hidden in it that people hope don’t get noticed because the bill is 200+ pages

        When you do the math, the rich will get a lot of money, the very poor will have lose money, the and middle class will break even but many will be put on unemployment.

        And it costs an extra $4,000,000,000,000, which is fucking bonkers.

          • 10001110101@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            From the people I know, who do depend on these programs and like Trump, they don’t believe they will have their benefits reduced. The think the other people, “taking advantage” of the system will be kicked off. It’s being sold as reducing fraud and abuse. The right-wing has been pushing this framing for decades, and many people have bought into it.

              • 10001110101@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Yeah, that’s how they sell it. Problem is, studies have shown the fraud in these programs isn’t much of an expense, in the broader context. And, Trump has granted clemency to Lawrence Duran, who stole $205M from Medicare, which tells you they don’t really care about that. These programs are actually pretty efficient, and spending funds to investigate small-time fraud would often cost more than just letting it happen. It’s not like tons of people wish to be on our shitty social programs that don’t even supply enough help for the people that absolutely need it.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            I guess the big argument is that giving a bunch of money to the wealthy will stimulate the economy. Although, that’s an argument that many nations, including the US, have 50 years of data on, and there isn’t much to support that argument. Trickle down economics hasn’t been shown to work.

            I also, if you’re in the camp that doesn’t believe in climate change and or thinks poor people are poor because of character flaws, then you probably like this thing. Or if you’re a wealthy person who donated a lot of money to republican politicians, you probably like this thing, because it’s a return on investment.

            It’s not particularly great. Many people on the right only voted for it because they’re afraid Trump will primary them, and end their political careers, if they oppose.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Although, that’s an argument that many nations, including the US, have 50 years of data on, and there isn’t much is nothing to support that argument. Trickle down economics hasn’t been shown to work has been conclusively shown to not work.

              FTFY

          • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            A lot of people still buy into trickle down economics despite consistently not working for the several decades we have tried it and reflexively support tax cuts for the wealthy. A lot of those same people also think that kicking people off of what they consider to be “welfare” will somehow magically result in those people quickly becoming employed, thinking that the reason they aren’t employed is because they aren’t facing serious enough consequences for unemployment.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              A lot of people still buy into trickle down economics despite consistently not working for the several decades we have tried it

              It has literally never worked, even over a century ago when it was called “horse and sparrow economics,” and it never will.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Because autocracy cannot sustain conflict of ideas. It was just a matter of time as every political scientist said 6 months ago.

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Fun fact: This isn’t the first time they’ve worked together and broke up. IIRC, Trump choose Musk for some advisory role during his first term (I don’t remember what, specifically). Musk resigned because Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I assume - Musk tried to pressure Trump to get more kickbacks, but t has loyalty elsewhere. Not to mention musk has aggravated everyone in the WH and someone from t’s inner circle told him to just cut him out because musk served his purpose and t agreed. And of course, musk isn’t president he is!

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The fact that he was able to get this in the first people is lol

      This is such a shit way to do industrial policy. Just hands out no conditions. China gonna teach US a lesson, gonna hurt. A generation of malinvestments across key industries. Clown capitalism.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m putting 50/50 odds that it’s an intentional, theatrical distraction from other more important things that are going on, or it’s just the inevitable outcome of two malignant narcissist sociopaths being in the same room together too often. If they quickly kiss and make up I’ll lean more towards the former than the latter.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Also maybe just a stock market pump. It seems like the shit always hits the fan on Fridays when the US stock markets are the last to still be open due to time zones and it has time to stick because everyone styas closed during the weekend. So everybody gets to see the news about it hitting the fan 💩

    • LadyButterflyshe/her@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’ve found criminals and high up business people are never friends, just friends when it suits them. They’ll have HUGE fallouts then be ok with each other when they need each other. Just IME

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Nah, musk has said some stuff that you don’t come back from. There is no way Trump says “eh, he accused me of being a pedophile but it’s all good”.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        That’s exactly my point. If they do in a few days “come back from” that and are all buddy buddy again, then I think that indicates it was just a staged performance for show and distraction and none of it was real fighting. Suggests it was all just an act. (IF they do come back from it. Which remains to be seen)

        Muskrat has already backed down from a few things he said in the “heat” of the argument, like that he was going to disassemble the Dragon capsules. So I wouldn’t jump to your conclusion that they can’t possibly “come back from” this, my point is just that if they do, it was probably all just an act to begin with because I agree if it’s real, stuff was said that neither one of these vindictive sociopaths is likely to forget.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    They’re both raging self obsessed narcs who can’t stand anyone else getting attention. It was just a matter of time.

    Tl;dr: housecats