• ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fascinating idea and I look forward to reading the book. As someone who has never seen protests be that effective as compared to other constituency pressure mechanisms, it’s an interesting counter point.

    The OP’s article indicates 3.5% of the population, which for the US at the moment would be around 340 million. 3.5% would be 11.9 million people.

    Rough guesses are that the protest saw about 4-6 million people out yesterday.

    I’m particularly curious about the paper’s coalition building concepts about tying immigration to other value such as worker rights, private sector interests such as agriculture, racial justice, etc.

    Beyond this I wonder if the analysis from ten years ago takes into account the technological isolation, manipulation, and echo chambering of modern politics. I would venture to guess that the 3.5% might need to be higher in a population that doesn’t listen to ‘untrusted opinions’.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Last count I saw from 50501 was about 8.6M. Traditional media is reporting about 5M. 50501 is probably including even small protests as this was done nearly everywhere including less official ones in small towns while trad media is probably only including the fully official larger ones.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or trad media is doing what it always does, minimizing progressive turnout and exaggerating right-wing numbers.