• ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Okay this went a totally different direction than how you made it sound at outset, which you presented like an “our guy versus your guy” argument and why you’re reaping downvotes and people willing to challenge you.

    what I’m pointing out is the inconsistency in how people react to vigilante violence itself

    So then is this what your actual problem is, that there is any celebration of vigilantism at all?

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I have a tendency to present my views in a provocative way, so I don’t exactly fault people for misreading me or my intentions.

      that there is any celebration of vigilantism at all?

      Pretty much, yeah. I think violence should, for the most part, only ever be a response to immediate violence - not a tool for political or ideological expression. I believe in due process, reason, and honest discourse as the means to influence those we oppose - not bullets, or even fists. So when people cheer for acts of vigilante violence, even against those they despise, I see that as both morally bankrupt and strategically self-defeating. It undermines the claim to the moral high ground and reinforces the very hostility many claim to oppose. We should hold ourselves to the same standards as we do others.