The Perchance dev noted that the new image model “is still training” and “will steadily improve in quality and gain new knowledge over the next few months.” Some users found this wording suggests possible self-improvement or ongoing learning. However, in standard practice, most AI models do not learn or evolve after deployment unless manually retrained by developers.

Some questioned whether the model is truly learning over time or whether this statement is simply a placeholder for continued dev-side maintenance.

Goal of the Question: To clarify based on common AI practice:

Is this model capable of continuous or micro-scale learning post-deployment?

If so, can users contribute indirectly (e.g., through use, rating, or feedback) to guide its development?

Or is all improvement strictly the result of developer-side retraining and version updates?

Understanding this helps the community know whether their activity matters in shaping the model—or if they should wait for official updates. It also opens the door to potential participatory development, if such feedback loops are supported.

  • OFF_THE_9TH@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    User generated input would be AI generated images and if that is fed back to the AI it would poison the AI instead of improving it, because I don’t know leave me alone :worried_tiger_emoji: