• Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The simple fact that under international law a state has a right to territorial integrity and safety from aggressive actions means that a state has a right to exist within their borders under international law.

      You are free to elaborate at any time on your point of view.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If that were the case then a state formed after conquest would be legitimate. But it clearly isn’t.

        Feel free to refer to Francesca Albanese, lawyer and scholar of internal law and current UN rapporteur for more question. I have no doubt that she is just vaguely more competent (and clearly more morally correct) than you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlbFSpNASO4

        • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          You should try forming a point of view of your own before attempting conversation in a very nuanced subject.

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            My point of view couldn’t be more clear. The state of Israel as it exists must be dismantled and a single state of equal rights for all must be established. The right to returned of the millions of Palestinians refugees must be complied with, and reparations should be paid.

            Yours on the other hand seems to be vague handwaivong at Zionist propaganda.