• Karjalan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doesn’t apply to my case

    Really? Anecdotal evidence, in a scientific setting, is described as

    casual observations/indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis

    This study is about the general trends of people judging others with tattoos incorrectly. It doesn’t mean everyone, always, judges people incorrectly.

    It also states that context matters for how accurately you judge someone. The gun, money, and the public information of his terrible actions, all change how you assess them and how accurate your assessment is.

    So in your case, yes, if you judged him as a rapist because he had a birthday tattoo, you were correct. But that is anecdotal evidence. And context based.

    Unless you’re implying everyone with a birthday tattoo is also a sexual assaulter/rapist, which is certainly a take, then it is anecdotal and doesn’t go against the studys findings.