jackeroni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 3 days agoJust bafflinglemmy.mlimagemessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageJust bafflinglemmy.mljackeroni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square279fedilink
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoDefinitely am not. I have plenty of supporting links. You all have … Comments
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoMy other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoAnd I told you, you posted a link to classic liberalism. It is a subset of liberalism it is not liberalism
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoNo. We’re right. You’ve been given references. Just because you obstinantly ignore those references does not make you correct or smart.
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoNo I’m right I gave references, nobody has provided anything that has shown that liberalism is right
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 hours agoThey gave references, you ninny. It doesn’t matter if you have references if everyone is bringing a lot more of rhem in to it, which they have. Again, obstinance should not be confused with being correct. That’s just being in denial… You are in denial.
minus-squareMelvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-27 hours agoWhat reference. The only one was a link to something I had already shared and it linked to the one area of liberalism that is considered center or center right. So let me know which link I’d love to know
You are factually incorrect.
Definitely am not. I have plenty of supporting links. You all have … Comments
My other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.
And I told you, you posted a link to classic liberalism. It is a subset of liberalism it is not liberalism
No. We’re right. You’ve been given references. Just because you obstinantly ignore those references does not make you correct or smart.
No I’m right I gave references, nobody has provided anything that has shown that liberalism is right
They gave references, you ninny. It doesn’t matter if you have references if everyone is bringing a lot more of rhem in to it, which they have.
Again, obstinance should not be confused with being correct. That’s just being in denial… You are in denial.
What reference. The only one was a link to something I had already shared and it linked to the one area of liberalism that is considered center or center right. So let me know which link I’d love to know