• Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Vegetables are a social construct too.

    Afaik, botanically, there is no such thing as a “vegetable”. Only fruits. What we perceive as “vegetable” differs between cultures worldwide.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Wait till you find out that some places around the world think fish meat does not count as meat and is vegetarian

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah I had a friend from Grenada that told me this one day and I had trouble understanding the reasoning.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The American Meat Science Association defines meat as red meat (beef, pork, and lamb), poultry, fish/seafood, and meat from other managed species (AMSA, 2017).

          Fish, by definition, is meat.

          Other simpler definitions around the world sinply say “flesh of an animal”. At that point, you’re arguing that fish isn’t an animal.

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The botanical definition is just “edible parts of a plant”. The culinary definition however does differs per culture.