• SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Luckily, that is extremely unlikely. Even if we were to burn all the fossil fuels on Earth, we wouldn’t even get close. Venus is 42% closer to the sun and has an atmosphere that is about 97% CO2 (compared to Earth’s 0.4%) and a bit over 90 times denser. Fun fact: the atmospheric pressure on the surface of Venus is the same as 900m underwater on Earth. Shit is soupy AF.

      To hit Venus numbers, we’d need a greater than 50% increase in solar luminosity combined with an approximately 2,200,000% increase in atmospheric CO2. That means going from about 3340 gigatonnes of atmospheric CO2 (based on current estimates) to more than 73,000,000 gigatonnes (7.3 × 10¹⁹ tonnes). It’s a staggering increase that is impossible without a massive outside input, like half the earth’s crust splitting open and blasting out CO2.

      Even if we were to substitute methane entirety for CO2, being a 28x more potent greenhouse gas, that still requires an additional 2,600,000 gigatonnes (2.6 × 10¹⁸ tonnes) of methane. Earth’s atmosphere in its entirety is only 5 × 10¹⁵ tonnes.

      • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just a small addition, Earth has a CO2 percentage of about 0.04. We’re not going to be like Venus. But there may still be catastrophic consequences for life as we know it.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      That would probably not happen at a human scale. Civilization would collapse and nature would heal.