fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 hours agoCursedmander.xyzimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 hours agoIs this a hard limit we’ve proven or can we still keep trying?
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 hours agoWe actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 hours agoFiguring out 1-4 must have been sooo tough
minus-squarerockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 hours agoIt’s the best we’ve found so far
Is this a hard limit we’ve proven or can we still keep trying?
We actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
Figuring out 1-4 must have been sooo tough
It’s the best we’ve found so far