Hi, Once in a while I try to clean up my tabs. First thing I do is use “merge all windows” to put all tabs into one window.

This often causes a memory clog and firefox get stuck in this state for 10-20 minutes

I have recorded one such instance.

I have tried using the “discard all tabs” addon, unfortunately, it is also getting frozen by the memory clog.

Sometimes I will just reboot my PC as that is faster.

Unfortunately, killing firefox this way, does not save the new tab order, so when I start firefox again, it will have 20+ windows open, which I again, merge all pages and then it clogs again !

So far the only solution I have found is just wait the 20 minutes.

Once the “memory clog” is passed, it runs just fine.

I would like better control over tab discard. and maybe some way of limitting bloat. For instance, I would rather keep a lower number of undiscarded youtube that as they seem to be insanely bloated.

In other cases, for most website I would like to never discard the contents.

In my ideal world, I would like the tabs to get frozen and saved to disk permanently, rather than assuming discard tabs can be reloaded. As if the websites were going to exist forever and discarding a tab is like cleaning a cache.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you need quick access to this many pages I suggest organizing bookmarks. As this is what they are meant for. Tabs are meant for active pages you are working with. So anytime you get that many tabs with any browser its gonna run like shit.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Nah, FF handles thousands of tabs just fine. I literally have just as many if not more tabs than OP and have never seen this issue. It’s either from the merge they’re doing or something else. It would be better if y’all just worked under the assumption that this does work and something is otherwise wrong with op’s setup.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I find organizing bookmarks incredibly tedious. I have bookmarks folder with thousands of tabs in and it’s just easier to use google again to re-find the information than to pick them out of bookmarks. Also tabs just keep the title and URL so you can’t even search the text inside. So, organizing a library of tabs is like a much worse version of google without previews. I also use the session manager addon but again, when you open thousands of tabs, it clogs up the memory almost instantly. It’s taking multiple gigabytes of ram, just to display a few kilobytes of text ! I wish the browser would just render the page as a static searchable text and image and then ditch all the javascript garbage.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        May I ask why you have to have this level of access to thousands of pages? Even for my job I have maybe 8 active that I use Firefox keywords to jump to.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would prefer not to save and tags tabs 500 times per day. It’s easier to let them accumulate and handle them all in memory.

          500 tab save and tag per day is too much labour, I would spend half my day just fiddling and sorting bookmarks !

  • Observer1199@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The solution to write your own application that does what you want because your workflow is not a use case that browsers are designed for. It’s not bad to wish for features but your workflow is never going to be catered for in a browser and it’s both unreasonable and unrealistic to expect otherwise - hence you need to do it yourself.

    If you can’t or don’t know how to do that yourself, I suggest you listen to the advice everyone else is giving you. Organisation does require ongoing work and given your comments it will likely require a lot of upfront effort to change your browser hygiene habits but once you are more organised it becomes a lot easier and a lot less work to stay on top of things.

    It’s none of my business but I wonder why you feel it’s so important to open 500+ tabs just to buy something small online. Doing research and being informed is good but it seems disproportionate and perhaps talking to a professional might help you with that.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      browser hygiene habits

      You used that term, and frankly I recoil a bit a this term because of the implication that it’s not a deficiency of the software but that it’s the users who are wrong.

      Still, I typed in the phrase into chatgpt

      And I see “reading lists” as an alternative to bookmarks (that I find to be, straight up unusable)

      So I found this reading list addon give a try.

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/reading_list/

      I have a very specific use for a “reading list”, which I take to be something like a FIFO stack of links. And that would be going through youtube videos.

      Putting this in case someone else is reading this thread looking for answers.

      However, it’s a side bar thing, and you have to add links one at a time, can’t select multiple tabs and add them

      As for opening 500+ tabs to buy a thing.

      You do know that sellers now use algorithmic pricing and often there will be hundreds of sellers for the same thing.

      Plus the price will be obfuscated with various artifices that all have to be overcome to find the best seller with the best price.

      Defeating all of that means openning a shit-ton of tabs.

      Here’s an example of the process I’ve designed for aliexpress

      https://github.com/igorlogius/gather-from-tabs/discussions/8

      • Observer1199@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        You used that term, and frankly I recoil a bit a this term because of the implication that it’s not a deficiency of the software but that it’s the users who are wrong.

        I wouldn’t say FF is deficient in this case - not being designed for your exact use case doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it.

        As for opening 500+ tabs to buy a thing.

        You do know that sellers now use algorithmic pricing and often there will be hundreds of sellers for the same thing.

        Plus the price will be obfuscated with various artifices that all have to be overcome to find the best seller with the best price.

        Defeating all of that means openning a shit-ton of tabs.

        I usually only buy things if I agree with the price it’s being sold at. If I don’t I will look elsewhere but ultimately I value my time more than money. Extra money can be earned, time cannot 🤷‍♂️ If you have to drive 100 miles to a fuel station to save 2 cent per gallon, are you actually saving money?

        Here’s an example of the process I’ve designed for aliexpress

        https://github.com/igorlogius/gather-from-tabs/discussions/8

        So it’s a script generating all the tabs?

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, I have to setup all the tabs in just the right way. Then for each tabs it gets the price and shipping information I paste that into excel Combine the total together and sort with ascending price Then I repeat that for every quantity value for 1,2,3,4,5,7,10,15,20,25,50,75,100 Then I find the minimum quantity to get the best price.

          This is because if you go to the website and just ask “order by price” it either hides most results, or straight up lies and still place them out of order. It also lies about the shipping cost. But it can’t lie on the last page before clicking buy.

          I expect the internet to continue becoming more deceptive and manipulative in this manner, my method is almost not good enough. If my tools don’t continue to evolve it will simply become impossible to find the best price for anything. It will all become an endless maze where they measure how much mental stamina you’re willing to waste to save another dollar. At that point the price of things will become whatever the maximum you individually will bear.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I came in here knowing exactly what the comments would look like, and I’m still disappointed. “Just don’t use so many tabs” is not an answer. If you don’t have anything constructive to say, just move on instead of getting uppity about…not using browsers very heavily or understanding other use cases.

    Yeah, thousands of tabs seems extreme. But “you should dedicate a larger amount of time and effort all day, every day to make the computer’s job easier” is a bad take. That’s obviously worse than OP’s existing workflow.

    Sorry OP, I don’t have a real answer either. You might find Arc Browser’s tab system to suit you better, but since it’s chromium-based I suspect performance might be worse.

    Edit: out of curiosity, how much memory does your PC have, and how much is Firefox using during these freezes? I wonder how much of the delay is caused by swapping.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just don’t use so many tabs" is not an answer.

      Yes it is. If somone is holding a knife upside down and complaining it doesn’t cut their steak, are you rude and ignore them? or comment that they’re doing it wrong? OP has the knife upside down.

      FF (or any browser AFAIK) is not designed to do this , OP is doing it wrong is a valid answer.

      On the flip side OP wants FF to change so it can do what they want, which is also valid. After all, a sensible person adapts to the environment around them, an insane person expects the environment to adapt to them, therefore all progess is made by insane people. Have at it OP :)

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes it is.

        It is worse than OP’s existing workflow, even though the existing workflow sucks. “Do this thing that sucks even more” is not an answer. “I don’t have this problem, so you must be mentally ill” is also not an answer.

        an insane person expects the environment to adapt to them, therefore all progess is made by insane people

        LOL. I love this.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        FF was designed to do this. There have been hundreds of bug reports that have been fixed over the years to literally make FF handle thousands of tabs just fine. If instead you had operated under the assumption that something was wrong you literally could help OP resolve the issue which is most likely something like their swap mem or the extension itself being written badly.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Frankly the answer is to not use so many tabs.

      I think it’s crazy to need more than 10 active tabs open, let along thousands. I’m a software developer who will regularly go down rabbit holes and I’d never dream of opening so many tabs.

      The fact is OP isn’t using the browser in a way that it was designed for. Plus they’re being unreceptive and rude in some of their replies.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ff literally was designed for this. It has had a significant number of bug reports over the years that improved this exact thing, opening thousands of tabs. That’s not the problem (I also have thousands of tabs open). If instead you had operated under the assumption that that wasn’t the problem maybe you could have helped OP find the actual problem, which I bet is probably that they disabled swap mem or the extension they’re using isn’t written well.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have to ask, how does one even manage thousands of open tabs?

          Like how do you find the 1 in 1756 tabs that you are looking for?

          Excuse me for thinking that that is an insane way to work and there is no way it can be productive. Like if you have a thousand open at any given moment, what are they all. What are you doing that warrants this? What’s wrong with bookmarks.

          I think the consensus here has been clear in that you guys are in the minority of people. And that’s on Lemmy where we skew tech literate and would mostly be power users. I just can’t see how it can be productive.

          Not calling you out here. Like I really need to know your workflow with some examples of the why?

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            You have different windows, different Multi-account containers. And if you type in something into your address bar it will just automatically jump to an open tab if you already have it open. No need to perform another search and find it. It’s not hard to maintain this many tabs. Just like it’s not hard to know where stuff is in your house. You keep the tools and cars in the garage, the yard equipment in the shed etc. You have thousands of items in your house or apartment, you don’t have trouble keeping those separated do you? Unless you’re one of those people that just tosses stuff as soon as they don’t need it anymore, but I don’t think that’s the majority of people, at least not from talking to my therapist it isn’t.

            And it’s not about being productive. Like, if I have one window open it might be for the research for a thing I want to buy, for example we’re thinking about getting starlink for camping. So I have a window open with like 50 fucking tabs because choosing a powersupply, figuring out the calculations for how much wattage I’m going to be using, etc. I need all those open. I mean I could move that into an obsidian doc, but that’s a hell of a lot of stuff to write down for something I only need to research and buy once. And then it gets left open because I already did the research and it’s much easier to find if I have to step away to do something else, or I put off the research for a week since we’re not camping yet.

            The same goes for work stuff. We’re testing stuff in salesforce and I have 10 tabs open for every test because you have to verify every single field of data I’m pushing from the backend into salesforce.

            But it’s not like I’m even noticing the 950+ tabs that are open. I don’t have that window open. I use sidebery so I can see all the tabs in my window with their full names at a glance (here’s an example of the current window where I’ve been responding to lemmy comments.

            And a lot of the times I open an article to read, then someone messages me to help them, I jump over to help them, and then I come back to the article in a week. Or two weeks. Or three months. And then after I’m finished with it I close it. But I’m not gonna bookmark that. Bookmarks are for stuff you keep coming back to. Managing bookmarks in a browser isn’t like managing a bookmark in a book you’re reading. Deleting them is harder, filing them is harder, etc.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve read this entire thread like three times and watched all the videos you’ve posted, and I still don’t understand your workflow at all.

    If searching bookmarks/history is harder than using Google to just find the thing you want to get back to, why do you need to keep the things you want to get back to open rather than just using Google to find the page again later? Or when you want to get back to something you (think you?) have left open, do you find it just by scrolling through all your tabs until a title/favicon looks like what you’re looking for?

    Your last paragraph makes it seem like maybe you want to keep the tabs open so if the page/content gets deleted off of the server, you don’t lose it. Is that correct? I’d imagine that doesn’t always accomplish that, though, right? (Particularly for something like YouTube.) If that’s a significant part of why you keep the tabs open, though, maybe that bit at least is a good question for a data hoarder community.

    I haven’t been able to find any “discard all tabs” addon for Firefox by Googling. And I can’t guess what exactly it does. (Does it save tab states to disk and suspend - but also leave open - all tabs or something?) Are you sure that’s the name of the addon you’re using?

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      why do you need to keep the things you want to get back to open rather than just using Google to find the page again later?

      If it’s already in memory, that’s one few step to reach it.

      My tab manager can’t search google

      do you find it just by scrolling through all your tabs until a title/favicon looks like what you’re looking for?

      I search my live memory with Tab Manager Plus

      Sadly, it can’t search tab body text, only tab titles.

      if the page/content gets deleted off of the server, you don’t lose it. Is that correct?

      My software should not discard data without my permission. When it runs out of RAM it should dump to disk cache, not delete. But browser have the builtin assumption that the web remembers everything, which is false. I also think bookmarks should save all tab data, all text, all images, all code, all video, and the code should remain as functional as possible. That’s a long way off, currently the only way to do that is freeze the tab with its browser and operating system inside a virtual machine live snapshot.

      I haven’t been able to find any “discard all tabs

      I believe this one can do, discard selected tabs, but not discard all tabs

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/discard/

      Discard is the action where all tab content is deleted, keeping only URL, title and favicon

      I haven’t found discard all tabs either.

      I would like “stop all tabs” to work

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stop-all-button/

      But it will only work after firefox has cleared the clog, it currently freezes with the rest of the browser.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If it’s already in memory, that’s one few step to reach it.

        I search my live memory with Tab Manager Plud

        Oh, so you’re doing something like Googling just to find the page title and then rather than clicking the link in Google, (closing the Google results page, I hope and) searching through your tab titles with Tab Manager Plus to find and switch to the open tab where you already have the page in question open?

        Though, I still don’t understand why you keep the tab open in the first place rather than juat closing the tab when you’re (at least for the moment) done with it and then Googling to find the content again and clicking the appropriate link to get that same content in a new tab when you do need it again. I asked whether the reason was so that if the content is removed from the server, you didn’t lose it, but I don’t think anything you said in your last post answered that question. You did say:

        My software should not discard data without my permission. When it runs out of RAM it should dump to disk cache, not delete.

        Which wasn’t quite a direct answer to my question. And you then directly admit that the browser doesn’t even keep content that’s open in a tab:

        But browser have the builtin assumption that the web remembers everything, which is false.

        So that must not be why you keep content open in tabs, right?

        Is it maybe something like if you keep something open in a tab, the presence of that page title in your tab manager gives you confirmation when you later Google to find the page title that such-and-such particular result in the Google results is indeed the thing you’re looking for and not a different page than the one you were looking for?

        Just as an aside, my web browser use is probably atypical as well. I have my browser forget all cookies, history, cache, etc (basically everything but my bookmarks) every time I fully close it. And I close it every time I switch activities to keep my online personas isolated from each other. (So I’m never logged into my Google account and my Amazon account at the same time, for instance. To reduce targeted ads and such.)

        Also, I’m wondering if something more like a caching proxy with maybe page searching capabilities and finegrained control of what is cached and what isn’t might fill part of your use case, but I still don’t have a firm grasp on your use case.

  • Leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You have 64GB RAM and that’s still not enough for your browser. Wow.

    I’ve come away from this with only more questions. What does your Downloads folder/Filesystem look like? Do you have notebooks or any real world allocation of information? What’s that like? What kinds of things do you keep in a junk drawer?

    Absolutely fascinating.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I do not waste time sorting, emails, downloads and bookmarks

      For my linux ISOs, which I have approx 60 terabyte of, I use dedicated sorting software and it does a really good job of keeping it all organized. I also make liberal use of symlinks and hardlinks to keep the original alive while also keeping things organized.

      As for notes, I have notepad++ with an endless series of titled untitled text files of everything I ever want to remembered. Shared accross computers using a local git server

      On my phone I have google keep which has a list of notes that has long since become far too long to scroll to the bottom off of. I am in the process of degoogling and I want to switch to a selfhosted file centric markdown note taking web app, not decided on which but this video is probably going to be one of them.

      I don’t have a junk drawer, my stuff is sorted into bins, here is a glimpse of that

  • Fetus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I terminate Firefox and reopen it any time it’s chewing up my RAM, but I usually don’t have more than 500 tabs open at any one time. My tabs persist when Firefox starts again, but tabs don’t fully load until I click on them again. This saves my memory from getting chewed up immediately, and can usually go a week or so before I need to do it again.

    • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      What? Even 500 tabs? I don’t understand this. I get about 10 open and I can’t read what they are. Please share a pic of what it has to look like with that many tabs open because I totally do not get this? I feel like this would be akin to asking “I can’t see out of my car windshield because I have completely covered it with sticky notes. How can I get to where I need to go?” This is not how browsers were designed to work.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have over a thousand just like OP and it works fine. Use a tree style tab browser and it’s much more usable than chrome or anything like that. OP’s problem is not having too many tabs.

  • idkicarus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Rather than try and force Firefox to deal with thousands of tabs, it’d be easier to use an add-on like SingleFile to download the tabs as self-contained HTML files. After that, you can search their contents using free tools like Agent Ransack or DocFetcher.

    If you prefer to keep the data in your browser, then how about using a service like Instapaper that lets you save pages for reading/referencing later as well as search their contents?

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    geez, just press Ctrl+W when you’re done with a tab, or if the tab is older than a couple hours

    I don’t understand why some are so attached to tabs. Search your history if you need it again.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I tried closing tabs, I have to finish reading them, make sure I got everything and that whatever reason I had for opening that tab was done. The result is that I spend all most all my time trying to close and sort and order tabs instead of doing what I was trying to do in the first place. And then the browser freezes for 10 minutes.

      Something is very wrong that 64GB is nowhere near enough to handle a few megabytes of text. And searching text inside of all tabs is an unthinkably difficult operation ?

      Where did the web go wrong !?

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not the web. It seems to me you might have an attention deficit issue. Try improving your workflow.

          • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Say these problems are fixed for now. How many tabs is enough? How do you see this tab hoarding progression being sustainable at all?

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              I would put the full text, image and video of every tab I have ever opened into the context memory of an open source LLM if I could. I would only consciously delete stuff that needs to stop existing immediately, like doxxing data or illegal data or malicious code.

              This is like asking, how many email should you keep.

              Well at work we auto delete all emails after 60 days.

              But my personal email has every email going back to 2006, the last storage failure before backup, and it’s all quickly searchable.

              The other limit would be storage space, but my cluster has still 180 terabyte empty space, I don’t see that getting filled up from plain browser data any time soon.

              Of course, I would like better automated data catalogging tools. I would like to ask my local open source LLM to “pull up all tabs regarding 7 megahertz maser project” and it should should open a browser window that contains every tab I have ever come accross on that topic. Including now-dead websites. It should all be sorted by date, it should know to put the more basic tabs to the left and the cutting edge stuff on the right. All this without me tagging a single thing, without wasting a minute of my time doing sorting busywork.

              It is the job of the computer to organize my data, in an offline, private, reliable, open source-based, enshittification-proof manner with infinite memory and perfect recall. So that I can get on with doing the stuff that I want to do and not fiddle with browser settings.

              Mozilla foundation has revenues in the 500 million range and a 7 million a year CEO, I expect nothing less.

              I applaud their initiative with llamafile, however I hope that was just an appetizer.

  • 0oWow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re not likely going to get any real help since you’re insisting on using the browser in an extreme and unconventional way. Your little world is just one browser/OS crash from losing all of those tabs.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      What is amazing to me is how some people will come out of the woodwork to tell a person when they think they’re using their browser “wrong”. Just let them be if you have nothing to contribute.

      • jwt@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        If someone is trying to achieve a goal through (what they might not know are) impossible means, “letting them be” isn’t going to help them.

        Although it might not seem very helpful (and indeed there are better ways of helping) pointing out the flaws in the approach is contributing more than “letting them be”. Doesn’t cost a thing to be civil about it though.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          What OP is trying to do isn’t impossible it’s actually very interesting. There are lots of people who use tab workflows instead of bookmarks. And I think everybody would benefit from better in-browser search. Just because bookmarks is how it was done 30 years ago doesn’t mean we can’t try new things.

          • jwt@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Unless you bring a solution to the table, taking the position that it isn’t impossible is just cheap contrarianism on your part. Sure we can try new things, but if it doesn’t work and everyone is commenting the approach isn’t helping, then maybe take the hint. Or not, and keep swimming against the stream (in which - seeing OP’s other comments - they seem to be more interested than actually solving the problem)

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              You dream to small Bookmarks suck and are cumbersome They sucked in 1996 and they still suck today ! Bookmarks have apparently been a crutch to make the browser more usable. Like for instance, instead of discarding a whole tab, keep a text index of the html body and make that searchable. But no, it’s an all of nothing thing, either 2gb of youtube javascript per tab, or we only keep URL and tab title.

              Also, you don’t actually need to bring a solution to the table just to say “this thing is not working right” You don’t have to be a mechanic to say “the car is broken” You don’t have to be a doctor to say “this person is sick”

              Clearly my message just need to be said over and over until it gets implemented. It is obvious where browsers are going. A total web awareness platform that remembers everything you’ve ever seen. There will be infinite tabs and a local llm will know it all 7 ways from sunday “Firefox, write a song about the 500 first tabs I’ve seen in June 2017, in the style of a broadway musical”

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why would it be impossible to search through tab content if it’s available in memory?

              • jwt@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                That’s not how it works. Right now the situation is: it doesn’t work. You claim it should be a workable situation. Show how it should work, don’t ask people to prove a negative.

  • Onihikage@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Sidebery (FOSS, MIT license) has several features that could be used to help you merge thousands of tabs into one window without choking out your memory usage, and generally makes it really easy to organize a massive amount of tabs. It would take several steps. First, you’d right-click the panel (the top-level organizational unit in Sidebery, above the tabs) on each window and select Save to bookmarks (example folder structure: selecting Bookmarks Toolbar/merge/ for a panel named panel1 would save the tabs under Bookmarks Toolbar/merge/panel1; click a folder twice in the selection dialog to expand it). Then you’d close that window and repeat with each window, being careful with the panel names so as not to overwrite any other window’s tabs. Once you’re down to one window, create an empty panel, right-click it, and select Restore from bookmarks. From this dialog, selecting the top-level folder that all the other bookmarked panels reside in (Bookmarks Toolbar/merge/ in this example) will import every tab from every window that was bookmarked, grouped by the window name.

    When Sidebery imports a panel from bookmarks, the tabs are imported in an unloaded state, so they have basically no effect on memory until you actually click into them and load them. I can restore about 50 tabs per second from bookmarks without my system even slowing down, taking me from 0 to 500 tabs in about 10 seconds. It’s not exactly a one-click option, but I wager it will be significantly faster and less prone to completely breaking than your current workflow, and a little easier to back up (even if window/session states get wonky, bookmarks sync pretty much instantly).

    Once your tabs are all in the same window, you can load tabs you want loaded by selecting a bunch (ctrl-click, shift-click, etc., just like in file explorer) and refreshing them, presumably avoiding YouTube tabs (should probably download those with YT-DLP anyway if you want to keep them). Sidebery will actually limit how many tabs it reloads at once, so it’ll never choke out your system by trying to instantly load a thousand of them (unlike if you select “open all in tabs” in Firefox’s native bookmarks context menu… eurgh). Even if it isn’t faster (though I suspect it is) the browser is at least usable while that’s going on. I’m not sure how well this method preserves containers, mainly because I don’t use them, so if you do, keep an eye on that if you test it out. All I know for sure is Sidebery supports reopening a tab in a new/different container because that’s in the default context menu.

    There’s more time savings than just window merging and tab loading, there’s the tree-style viewing, being able to collapse whole trees of tabs you aren’t actively paying attention to, seeing the full titles of 30-40 tabs at a time, no more sideways scrolling, a built in search bar to filter shown tabs by title, fully customizable keyboard shortcuts and context menus… it’s actually incredible how much this addon can do, and not only does it have a lot of settings and customization that should let you tailor its behavior to exactly how you want it, you can even sync its actual settings through Firefox! (just make sure to set your device name) Only thing it can’t do is remove the tab strip to give you more vertical real estate, but Mozilla might be working on that.

    I know what it’s like to be attached to a cumbersome workflow. I hope this can help streamline things for you a bit and make life with ~2,000 tabs just a little less troublesome.

  • sgtlion [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I tend to have ~10,000 tabs because I obsessively fail to clean up. But it never takes much memory or cpu, my PC isn’t amazing yet Firefox is always lightning quick.

    I’ve never used the discard or merge windows features though, I can see why those might cause issues. I assume these two functions just aren’t optimised for so many tabs.

    One addon I might recommend to help keep numbers down is Duplicate Tab Closer, which has options to specify how similar tabs can be to be considered duplicates, and also will detect across all open windows if desired.

  • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Have you tried increasing the size of your swap memory in windows? Otherwise known as “virtual memory”. Depending on the speed of your drive and available space, you might be able to increase the vertual memory size to get more performance.

    But what about using a page archiving service, even a self-hosted one, like Shiori. Shiori has an extension that can allow for single click page archiving right from the browser. The pages are saved as html files or txt files and it will create a readability version of the file which is just the text and images. You could then search the files and their contents using something like VS Code to search the whole directory where the files are stored. There are plenty of other ways to do that search once you have those archives, though. I think even Windows File Search will search the contents of a txt or html file stored on the device.

    Shiori also has its own search, which is pretty fast, and searches the contents of the archives as well.

  • chillhelm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not going to tell you that you’re managing your information wrong. I would physically die if I had ever more than 20 tabs (my ADHD couldn’t handle it).

    But I think you might be using the wrong tool. A browser (like Firefox) is not really designed as an information manager. It’s primary purpose is navigating and visualizing web pages. So when you talk about “a few megabytes of text and images” thats not what your browser sees. Your browser handles more than just the text and images. It also handles fetching and prefetching, a browser history for every tab, a JS context and much much more.

    What you want is some kind of personalized archiving system that processes websites into machine processable (ie searchable) structures. Firefox is not that. Maybe data hoarder communities will have the answers you seek.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well so far, it would be too much friction and extra labour to export each tab to external software.

      I’m not even sure what software other than a browser would display live web pages in a more organized manner than firefox ?

      I’m pretty sure I just hit a bug that’s causing firefox to wake up too many tabs and not handle tab discarding correctly. Firefox does seem like the best tool still even if it’s not working right.

      What I would like instead is a browser that treats tabs more like virtual machines that you can roll back, suspend to disk and resume. Little package of data that get frozen in time and are externally searchable.

      Anyway, here’s my setup

      • chillhelm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        What I would like instead is a browser that treats tabs more like virtual machines that you can roll back, suspend to disk and resume. Little package of data that get frozen in time and are externally searchable.

        Maybe look at ArchiveBox. IIRC it has pretty much everything you ask for including an import from your browser history and bookmarks.