So the article only seems to raise these two cases, and it’s not clear to me that either of these two people hurt any kids after appealing their check.
Is it just me or is this cooked? The right to appeal decisions seems fundamental to help reduce malfunctions or biases in a system. If the appeals process is too lax (doesn’t seem like it?) then strength it sure but wtf is this move?
What in the gender essentialist fuck? You cannot bar all men from jobs involving kids. You need a working with children check to run an extracurricular class, what are you smoking?
Well, in general most crimes are committed by men so we should probably just throw them all in jail. That way they wont even need a WWC. No more crimes, no WWC needed - win,win!
I needed a WWC for a council park worker job, probably in case there’s kids at the playground while we’re whipper snipping or whatevs.
Sorry champ, can’t have you raping the kids. Considered more male appropriate work like investment banking? Leave those jobs that involve contributing to society in community to us girls.
champ? NSFW - violence/language: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViI8FUU9lHM