• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I decided to look and found that this metric is almost always measured by vehicle distance travelled rather than by population. Basically the graph OP shared is useless and meant to support a narrative, as you stated.

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think it’s kinda interesting still, in that it shows people are (must?) drive so much. But yes, agree that per cap seems like the wrong statistic for any kind of safety.

      Maybe more fair would be transit fatalities per mile traveled (any method)?

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Does that mean that Canadians in Alberta, Quebec, and Ontario simply don’t drive long distances inside their provinces? That doesn’t track with what I’ve seen when visiting all three provinces.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Calgary relatives: “oh I’m just going to zip up to Edmonton for the day” or go for a coffee 40km to the other side of town or just do the daily 130km commute etc.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          For AB I’m thinking its more “I can’t afford to live in Banff, but that’s where work is so a place in Canmore is where I call home with a 30 min commute each way.”

          Or “Yeah I like living in Red Deer, but it means a 1.5 hour drive one way if I want to see the Flames beat the skates off the Leafs when they’re in town.”