Zarah Sultana has resigned from the UK’s Labour Party after 14 years to lead a new party with former Labour leader and independent MP Jeremy Corbyn.

“Today, after 14 years, I’m resigning from the Labour Party,” she said in a statement on Thursday evening local time.

“Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other Independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country.”

Sultana cited the Starmer government’s support for Israel’s war on Gaza as a reason for leaving, saying that “this government is an active participant in genocide. And the British people oppose it.”

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Jessica Elgot, on BlueSky:

        -There have long been significant divisions between senior figures close to Corbyn over how such a movement on the left should operate - some keen to begin as a new party and others less so. Sources adamant tonight Corbyn not agreed to any joint leadership of a new party.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          A MSM journalist opposing progressives by citing “anonymous sources” is not really evidence yet.

          If Corbyn does launch a new party, a huge MSM smear campaign like the last time is to be expected.

          • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I always call out this conspiracist stuff when the right do it, so I’ll do exactly the same when it come from the left.

            As @[email protected] put it, ‘either those reports are true or Corbyn went radio silent on the announcement of his new party and let there be room for this speculation.’ In fact, both sides are true: the party has been ‘launched’ without a coherent structure, leadership or even a name, and Corbyn has chosen to say nothing about it. These are facts. There’s no smear involved.

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Corbyn is not silent though

              Jeremy Corbyn outlines plan for new political party and pledges: ‘I am here to serve the people’

              I’m not blaming you but the “journalists” in this one. We must not forget the tremendous “antisemite” smear campaign they launched against Corbyn because he opposed Israel.

              Right wing tabloid TheDailyMail is already going in full force to generate “speculations of leftist infighting”

              We see the BBC staff literally saying that their news favours Israel. TheGuardian is slightly better but has proven for an entire year after October 7 that they will join a media blitz for Israel. And they too smeared Corbyn. Guardian writers like Owen Jones who smeared Corbyn in the past now admit that they were wrong to do so and that Corbyn was right.

              Surely you’re not going to say that the organized media smear campaign against Corbyn was a “conspiracy”.

              • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                This is not inconsistent with anything I said yesterday or, indeed, this morning.

                There was not an organised media smear campaign against Corbyn. ‘The media’ is not in any sense a group of people who said ‘Let’s all agree to tell lies about Corbyn’, which is what an organised smear campaign would have to look like. The media has always been persistently unfair, to the level of insanity, about everyone to the left of the Conservatives, but there’s nothing organised about it, it’s just powerful people representing their own interests.

    • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      We really went from the Independent Group (anti-Corbyn) to the Independent Group (pro-Corbyn) and Corbyn somehow hates both. Corbyn truly is one of a kind, and I don’t mean that in a good way.

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Accidentally launching a party co-lead by someone who doesn’t want to lead it is something only the British left could’ve accomplished.

        • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Then there’s people, like the Canary, who are trying to spin the reports of Corbyn hostility as a media smear.

          Like, either those reports are true or Corbyn went radio silent on the announcement of his new party and let there be room for this speculation. You’d think someone who’s been dealing with a hostile media for a decade would know better.

            • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s amazing that to gage if Corbyn supports Sultana’s party we have to read between the lines of an interview with ITV from a few days ago instead of Corbyn just stating he’s with the initiative.

              Either the reports are true, or this is a major comms failure on the yet-to-be-named party’s part. Having the initial talk of your new party being if the supposed co-founder is involved isn’t a good look. Corbyn has a lot to be rightfully mad at the media for, but this is one is on him.

              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                To be clear is this “the evidence that Corbyn is furious”? A writer for the right wing “The Sunday Times”? or am I missing something?