Welp…

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

  • markstos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    One obstacle all third parties face in the US is party-line voting, which favors the dominant parties.

    On possible outcome is that he puts a lot of money into making third party candidates more viable, like efforts to ban party-line voting or supporting ranked choice voting. So, you could vote for the America Party candidate and then if they don’t have a majority ñ, you vote could roll over to the Dem or GOP candidate of your choice, reducing your risk of voting third party.

    These changes would help Libertarian, Green and other parties as well. More choice for voters!

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Odd strategy.

    Leftists won’t buy it, and most liberals aren’t going to buy it, and it might divide the right, while team blue is fracturing.

    Gonna be a 4 on one, not a 3.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Reading the article to see what ridiculous name he’s going to give it.

    “The America Party”?

    TBH, pretty tame in Must standards. At least it’s pronounceable.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I hope this would split the vote among magas and republicans and the dems would be a shoe in. Sadly, I’ve lost a lot of faith in the dems and their ability to effectively fight for the people. Maybe we need even more parties?

    • lando55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m all for it. If Brewster’s Millions taught me anything it’s that involving yourself in US politics is the quickest way to lose vast sums of money.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Maybe that’s the only way US will ever get a third party. I’m not an American but I do think american politics system would be significantly stronger even with a minority 3rd party. Can you imagine how powerful US would be with a diverse parlament that has true competition of ideas not just partisan voting? That’s true “checks and balances”.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The problem is the US isn’t setup for third parties to really work, all this is going to do is most likely be a spoiler vote from Republicans and give more wins to Democrats. Maybe if they’re lucky they’ll win a few seats in uncompetitive districts.

    • Ruxias@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We don’t need more false choice though. This would be a another bourgeois party. The cards might be shuffled a bit and the rhetoric might change but it’d still be playing the same game with the same cards. It’s still a game of “choose your favorite faction of rich people” despite the tweaks in messaging. There will still be an assurance of “nothing will fundamentally change” to the owners and donors.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    At least give it a cool name like The (John) Galt Party or something so it has a better change of splitting the right. I guess the nazi party was already taken?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      He isn’t trying to split the right, he actually thinks he can win because he’s a fucking narcissist. So they will siphon votes from Democrats by pretending to be pro-Gaza and all of the kids who refuse to read a fucking book will buy it and vote for them.

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      he’s just so bad with names. Surprised he didn’t call it the X Party. wouldn’t that have been more “cool”? surprised he didn’t ask Grok to come up with party names, I mean hell I use chatgpt to come up with names for videogame characters and it works well.

      This is going to fizzle out when he inevitably gets distracted by something else.

  • jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Oh, can “aliens” start political parties in the USA?

    Imma start a “British Colony” party over there; anyone want to join me? MAABCA.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So, another copy of the Libertarian Party?

    But even more barefacedly just “republicans who don’t want to pay their taxes”

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hey, the Libertarian Party do more than that. Like smoke weed and celebrate the idea of freedom but then rage about immigrants and ignore companies fucking them over.

  • Part4@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Even opening up a poll on X to see what his users think about the idea…

    Presumably the other headline that read ‘50% of voters’ were in favour of this party, should have read ‘50% of X users who voted in the poll (a potentially large proportion of which were bots owned and controlled ultimately by Elon Musk) were in favour of this party’

    1. US (and in fact all ‘Western’) media is as bent as anything in the former Soviet Union.

    2. America certainly is in the hypernormalisation phase. I’m not sure how far behind the UK (and other Western nations media) is because I really don’t engage in the media here. But any Murdoch owned media (like Fox in the US) is at the very least poisonous to open and fair democracy, and egalitarian society.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The entire Democrat demographic hates him for kissing Trumps ass.

    The entire Trump demogaphic hates him for going against Trump.

    And the Republican demographic have never liked him as far as I’m aware.

    So… who are his voters? Probably just a convenient way to shuffle money around.