• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is how descriptivists try to cope with the fact that they’re academics who claim that some random guy who has never seen a dictionary knows better than academics do.

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tell me this, why don’t “but” and “put” sound similar?

      What about “height” and “weight”, what’s the rule here? And what makes a letter silent in a word? If any of these rules have exceptions, then why are there exceptions?

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even descriptivists accept there has to be some degree of balance. Yes, language evolves, that doesn’t mean I can start calling my shoes bhurghs and expect anyone to know what I’m talking about.

      But if it catches on…

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s literally one in the topic of this post. And don’t tell me you haven’t dealt with crazy randos on Reddit that rake the same stance

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve seen descriptivists take the position that if enough people use a made up word it counts as communication, but the only people I’ve ever seen saying “well I’m gonna call a tree a xopo instead” are prescriptivists who don’t understand descriptivism.

              • psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are so many specific technical things in my workplace that have words in the small group that cares about them.

                They won’t find their way into dictionaries, but they are meaningful and useful. Some words like that have leaked into popular speech; my work isn’t the sort to have its gone grown words spread.

                (My phone dislikes me pluralising “cares”. I presume it was taught in America)